The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Obstetric outcome in 100 women with severe anxiety over childbirth
Abstract
Background. Extreme fear of delivery with request of cesarean section is a problem. The obstetric outcome in women given psychological and obstetric support is described. Methods. Women, consecutively referred to the Psychosomatic outpatient clinic because of fear of delivery (n= 100), were compared to a matched reference group (n=100). Results. The women in the study group had higher frequency of psychic problems than the references. The majority, 68 of the women (68%) initially requested cesarean section (CS). After individualized psychological and obstetrical support, 38 of these women agreed to vaginal delivery (38%) and 30 had an elective CS (30%). In the end another 13 (13%) women had a CS for obstetric or mixed reasons. Complication rate was low and similar in the groups. The 57 women who eventually had a vaginal delivery (57%) showed an obstetric outcome similar to the reference group. They had a higher frequency of induction of labor (p=0.02), and of epidural and pudendal blocks for pain relief (p=0.002 and 0.05 respectively). They had shorter labor time (p=0.05). The cost of the psychological therapy was well compensated for by the savings due to the reduction in the number of CS. Conclusions. Psychosomatic support for women with severe fear of delivery resulted in a 50% reduction of CS for psychosocial indications and vaginal deliveries similar to a reference group. The cost of psychosomatic support was less than savings due to fewer cesarean sections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reasons for anxiety about childbirth in 100 pregnant women
Sjögren, B. (1997) · Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.3109/01674829709080698 · Cited by 168
Self-citation
Cited by
Waldenström, U., Hildingsson, I., & Ryding, E. (2006) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00950.x · Cited by 415
Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: a study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery
Adams, S., Eberhard‐Gran, M., & Eskild, A. (2012) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03433.x · Cited by 378
Implications of Antenatal Depression and Anxiety for Obstetric Outcome
Andersson, L., Sundström-Poromaa, I., Wulff, M., Åström, M., & Bixo, M. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000135277.04565.e9 · Cited by 362
Few women wish to be delivered by caesarean section
Hildingsson, I. (2002) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology · doi:10.1016/s1470-0328(02)01393-9 · Cited by 294
Laursen, M., Hedegaard, M., & Johansen, C. (2008) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01583.x · Cited by 233
Metadata
- Authors
- Sjögren, B., & Thomassen, P.
- Venue
- Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-10
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 948-952
- ISSN
- 0001-6349 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0412
- OpenAlex
- W2057320874
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Obstetric outcome in 100 women with severe anxiety over childbirth. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/00016349709034907
- The paper
- Sjögren, B., & Thomassen, P. (1997). Obstetric outcome in 100 women with severe anxiety over childbirth. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349709034907
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.