The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Improving the Reliability of Testing the Speech Reception Threshold for Sentences
Abstract
An accurate test for measuring the speech reception threshold (SRT) for sentences in quiet or in noise has been developed. It is shown that with ten carefully selected lists of only 13 sentences each, a high test-retest reliability can be obtained. The standard deviation of SRT measured with the different lists is approximately 1 dB.Nous avons mis au point une épreuve fidèle pour la mesure du seuil de réception de la parole (SRT) concernant des phrases émises dans une ambiance silencieuse et/ou dans une ambiance bruyante. Nous montrons qu'avec 10 listes soigneusement choisies et compre-nant chacune seulement 13 phrases, on peut avoir une confiance suffisante après épreuve et contre-épreuve. L'écart-type du SRT mesuré avec les différentes listes est approximativement égal à 1 dB.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Top-down and bottom-up processes in speech comprehension
Zekveld, A. A., Heslenfeld, D. J., Festen, J. M., & Schoonhoven, R. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.199 · Cited by 203
Perception of Speech and Sound
Kollmeier, B., Brand, T., & Meyer, B. (2008) · Springer Handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49127-9_4 · Cited by 56
Metadata
- Authors
- Plomp, R., & Mimpen, A. M.
- Venue
- International Journal of Audiology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1979-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-52
- ISSN
- 1499-2027 (ISSN-L)
- 1708-8186
- OpenAlex
- W2201699278
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
