The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quality of Life in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms: An Improved Evaluation of Treatment Regimens?
Abstract
There is growing interest in measuring quality of life (QoL) in medicine. Together with objective variables such as healing rate, as recorded with endoscopy, this is believed to give a better basis for evaluation of treatment regimens in patients with upper gastrointestinal diseases. A strategy for the assessment of QoL in patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms is presented here. The QoL evaluation was based on a battery of questionnaires, covering both general and specific aspects of life. General well-being was evaluated with the Psychological General Well-being Index (PGWB), and subjective symptoms with two specific questionnaires, the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) and the Ulcus Esophagitis Subjective Symptoms Scale (UESS). This new strategy was applied clinically in a study including 146 outpatients with suspected peptic ulcer. Initially, the patients reported a low degree of general well-being as evaluated with the PGWB, but the values returned to those found in normal populations within 4 weeks. Evaluation of the GSRS and UESS with regard to internal consistency, construct validity, and the ability to detect changes showed them to be satisfactory. The psychometric documentation of the measures indicates that they may give reliable and clinically valid information when used for evaluation of medical treatments in upper gastrointestinal disease. Further documentation of the methods is, however, needed to establish a generally acceptable QoL assessment in gastroenterology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931
Cited by
Quality of life in obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review of the literature
Moyer, C. A., Sonnad, S. S., Garetz, S. L., Helman, J. I., & Chervin, R. D. (2001) · Sleep Medicine · doi:10.1016/s1389-9457(01)00072-7 · Cited by 272
The impact of functional gastrointestinal disorders on quality of life
Koloski, N. A., Talley, N. J., & Boyce, P. M. (2000) · The American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.01735.x · Cited by 204
Jerndal, P., Ringström, G., Agerforz, P., Karpefors, M., Akkermans, L. M., Bayati, A., & Simrén, M. (2010) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01493.x · Cited by 192
Niv, D., & Kreitler, S. (2001) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1046/j.1533-2500.2001.01016.x · Cited by 179
Ohlsson, B., Truedsson, M., Bengtsson, M., Torstenson, R., Sjölund, K., Björnsson, E. S., & Simrèn, M. (2005) · Neurogastroenterology & Motility · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2982.2005.00679.x · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Dimenäs, E., Glise, H., Hallerbäck, B., Hernqvist, H., Svedlund, J., & Wiklund, I.
- Venue
- Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 681-687
- ISSN
- 0036-5521 (ISSN-L)
- 1502-7708
- OpenAlex
- W1996358629
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 32.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quality of Life in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms: An Improved Evaluation of Treatment Regimens? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/00365529309098272
- The paper
- Dimenäs, E., Glise, H., Hallerbäck, B., Hernqvist, H., Svedlund, J., & Wiklund, I. (1993). Quality of Life in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms: An Improved Evaluation of Treatment Regimens? Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529309098272
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.