Cited by 173Problem and Project Based LearningInnovations in Medical EducationInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Using team-based learning to teach pharmacology to second year medical students improves student performance

Zgheib, Nathalie K., Simaan, Joseph A., Sabra, Ramzi·2010·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Team-based learning (TBL) is an innovative instructional method that fosters active learning. It has been shown to improve student performance in some health care education courses. AIM: To examine the effect of teaching pharmacology using a TBL approach on second year medical students' satisfaction and performance. METHODS: A modified TBL method was used in two case-based discussion sessions of the second year pharmacology course: a relatively easy drug metabolism/pharmacogenetics session and a more challenging pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) session. Individual and group answers to all questions were recorded, and an evaluation form was collected for each session. Class performance on a summative quiz was compared to previous years. RESULTS: Students provided positive feedback. Group performance was better than individual performance during the TBL exercises. TBL was less successful when the questions were very difficult, with a difficulty range of 30-70% being the most appropriate. Performance of the class on the pharmacology summative quiz showed significant improvement over that in previous years in the PK/PD part, but was unchanged in other topics taught traditionally. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that TBL provides a better outcome for students, and provide insight into appropriate design of TBL exercises.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01421590903548521

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zgheib, N. K., Simaan, J. A., & Sabra, R.
Affiliations
American University of Beirut (LB)
Corresponding author
Sabra, Ramzi
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2010-01
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
130-135
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2170849796
Cited by
173
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
48.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
team-based learning, pharmacology education, second-year medical students, active learning, student satisfaction, group versus individual performance, question difficulty, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, pharmacogenetics, drug metabolism, case-based discussion
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Education, Medical, Educational Measurement, Group Processes, Humans, Pharmacology, Teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review