Cited by 33Innovations in Medical EducationHealth and Medical EducationChild and Adolescent Health

Teaching social determinants of child health in a pediatric advocacy rotation: Small intervention, big impact

Klein, Melissa, Vaughn, Lisa M.·2010·Medical Teacher

Abstract

Melissa Kleina*b & Lisa M. Vaughnaca Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USAb MELISSA KLEIN, MD, is an assistant professor and her primary interests include resident education and underserved populations.c LISA M. VAUGHN, PhD, is an associate professor and she is formally trained as a social psychologist and medical educator with primary research interests in socio–cultural issues affecting the health of families, especially immigrant and minority populations.* Correspondence: Melissa Klein, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Division of General and Community Pediatrics, Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA 513-636-4506 513-636-7247 melissa.klein@cchmc.orgBackground: Traditionally, medical education does not specifically address the social determinants of health or how to advocate for families’ cultural, social or economic needs in spite of our increasingly diverse society.Aim: This article describes a new social–legal curriculum added to a Pediatric Resident's Advocacy course.Methods: Pediatric interns completed ‘Memos To Myself’ after the Advocacy rotation.Results: The curriculum impacted residents’ (1) realization regarding family circumstances; (2) reflections regarding self and personal practice; and (3) knowledge about advocacy issues and community partnerships for solutions.Conclusions: This curriculum raised awareness about topics that are traditionally not covered in medical education.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01421591003690320

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The majority of included pediatric curricula were published after 2001 and directly referenced the inclusion of child advocacy in the requirements as part of the rationale for their creation.

    “the majority were published after and directly referenced the inclusion of child advocacy in the requirements as part of the rationale for their creation.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, M., & Vaughn, L. M.
Affiliations
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, Melissa
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2010-08-26
Volume
32
Issue
9
Pages
754-759
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2157465682
Cited by
33
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
social determinants of health, child health, pediatric residency education, family situation, community partnerships, underserved populations
MeSH terms
Child, Child Advocacy, Child Welfare, Humans, Internship and Residency, Medical Assistance, Ohio, Pediatrics, Public Housing, Social Problems, Socioeconomic Factors, Needs Assessment, Vulnerable Populations, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review