The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer feedback as an aid to learning – What do we want? Feedback. When do we want it? Now!
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: With 360° appraisals integral to professional life, learning how to give constructive feedback is an essential generic skill. AIM: To use a formative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) for skills acquisition and development in giving feedback, whilst facilitating awareness of the importance of communication skills in clinical practice. METHODS: Medical and nursing students took part in a formative OSCE. Using actors as simulated patients, a three-station OSCE circuit was repeated three times so that students could rotate through the roles as 'candidate', 'examiner' and 'observer'. As 'candidates', they received immediate feedback on their consultation from the 'examiner'/'observer'. The events were evaluated using a questionnaire and focus groups. RESULTS: Students immensely valued this learning event for considering expectations for a performance (91-100%). Concerns around giving peers feedback were acknowledged, and they were divided on preference for feedback from peers or tutors (48% versus 52%). But training in providing feedback and criteria for assessment were considered helpful, as was instruction by faculty to give corrective feedback to peers. CONCLUSIONS: Peer observation and professional accountability for giving constructive feedback enhanced awareness of their skills education and training needs. It also opened the dialogue for identifying opportunities for peer assessment and feedback to support work-based education and skills development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When implemented with clear guidelines and adequate training, it serves as a valuable complement to instructor-led evaluations, providing diverse perspectives on performance while promoting active engagement in the learning process [86,87].”
From Formative assessment and feedback in medical education: A practical guide: AMEE Guide No. 189 (2026) · cites this paper as [87]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
Teaching For Quality Learning At University
BIGGS, J. B., & Tang, C. S. (1999) · Cited by 7,559
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070600572090 · Cited by 5,846
Topping, K. J. (2005) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410500345172 · Cited by 1,597
Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society
Boud, D. (2000) · Studies in Continuing Education · doi:10.1080/713695728 · Cited by 1,545
Feedback in Clinical Medical Education
Ende, J. (1983) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1983.03340060055026 · Cited by 1,259
Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment
Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562510600680582 · Cited by 1,034
Do students value feedback? Student perceptions of tutors’ written responses
Weaver, M. R. (2006) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930500353061 · Cited by 807
Peer teaching in medical education: twelve reasons to move from theory to practice
ten Cate, O., & Durning, S. J. (2007) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590701606799 · Cited by 729
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615 · cited 1×
“The activity offered an opportunity for collaborative and vicarious learning (Cox 2008; Gielen et al. 2010; Van Gennip et al. 2010).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Chambers SL, 2000, Am J Pharm Educ, 64, 283
- Ladyshewksy RK, Developing health professionals through the use of reciprocal peer coaching. In Herrmann A, Kulski MM, editors. Flexible futures in tertiary teaching. Proceedings of the 9th Annual teaching learning forum, 2000 February 2–4. Perth: Curtin University of Technology. <http://lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2000/ladyshewsky.html>
- Shin E, 2009, Perception vs reality peer feedback practices to enhance preservice teacher reflection during an elementary early clinical experience
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–120 of 120
Soeker, M. S. (2014) · UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape)
Effective Evaluation: I TRY, Letʼs ACE it
Veysman, B. D. (2012) · Emergency Medicine News · doi:10.1097/01.eem.0000410946.08038.c3
0145 Peer Feedback Needs Practice And Faculty Support To Be Effective In Simulation Based Education
Condron, C. M., & Tibbits, P. (2014) · BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning · doi:10.1136/bmjstel-2014-000002.64
The Intervention of Active Learning Strategies to Increase Nursing Student Self-Directed Learning
Patterson, J. A. (2015) · ePublications at Regis University (Regis University)
Usability of Social Impact of Mobile Social Media－Focusing on Language Teaching－
김언조 (2013) · Korean Language Research · doi:10.16876/klrc.2013..32.5
Is Peer Assessment Reliable in Objectively Structured Clinical Examination?
Dagmura, H., Daldal, E., Bakır, H., Daşıran, M. F., Özsoy, Z., Demir, O., Okan, İ., & Bülbüloğlu, E. (2020) · Bagcilar Medical Bulletin · doi:10.4274/bmb.galenos.2020.09.054
Peer feedback needs practice and faculty support to be effective in simulation based education.Preprint
Offiah, G., Walsh, O. C., Alkharaing, A., Sullivan, C., Mullhall, C., Tibbits, P., Hill, A. D. K., & Condron, C. M. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.22223/v1
Chamberlain, K. A. (2022) · Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3745-2.ch006
Marcial, M. R. (2022) · Journal of Medicine University of Santo Tomas · doi:10.35460/2546-1621.2022-sp14
Do the teaching, practice and assessment of clinical communication skills align?Preprint
Dewi, S. P., Wilson, A., Duvivier, R. J., Kelly, B. J., & Gilligan, C. (2024) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-3876983/v1
Dvořáčková, V. (2024) · Discourse and Interaction · doi:10.5817/di2024-1-30
Allison, K. R., & Morris, R. (2024) · Journal of Teaching in Social Work · doi:10.1080/08841233.2024.2408317
Enhancing the structure of feedback forms increases trustworthiness and usefulness of peer feedback
Quinton, J. M., Nesbitt, L., & Bock, J. (2025) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2025.2468848 · Cited by 3
Dewi, S. P., Wilson, A., Duvivier, R. J., Kelly, B. J., & Gilligan, C. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26728687
‘Dragon's Den’: Gamifying Handover Skills Teaching
Mina, M. C., Ahmad, M., & Skinner, J. (2026) · The Clinical Teacher · doi:10.1111/tct.70338
Nanda, R., Shah, S., Abraham, J., Patel, S., & Mohapatra, E. (2026) · Indian Journal of Medical Biochemistry · doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10054-0352
Metadata
- Authors
- Cushing, A., Abbott, S., Lothian, D., Hall, A., & Westwood, O. M. R.
- Affiliations
- Queen Mary University of London (GB)
- City, University of London (GB)
- St George's, University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Westwood, Olwyn M. R.
- ORCID
- Hall, Angela
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-01-28
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- e105-e112
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2034821349
- Cited by
- 121
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Queen Mary University of London
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Keywords
- peer feedback, constructive feedback, formative assessment, OSCE, standardized patients, communication skills, clinical skills training, peer observation, peer assessment, medical students, nursing students, professional accountability, workplace education
- MeSH terms
- Feedback, Humans, Learning, Peer Group, Physical Examination, Students, Medical, Students, Nursing, Time Factors, Patient Simulation, Focus Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
