Cited by 58Innovations in Medical EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceHealth and Medical Education

Facilitators and barriers to a nationwide implementation of competency-based postgraduate medical curricula: A qualitative study

Open access
Jippes, E., Van Luijk, S.J., Pols, J., Achterkamp, M.C., Brand, P.L.P., Van Engelen, J.M.L.·2012·Medical Teacher

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postgraduate medical education (PGME) curricula are being redesigned across the western world. AIM: This study examined the implementation process (what works where and why) of new competency-based PGME curricula and relevant factors influencing this process. METHODS: In a nationwide project (2006-2010) in the Netherlands, competency-based PGME curricula were implemented for residents in Pediatrics and Obstetrics & Gynecology. The authors conducted 25 semi-structured interviews and used a multi-level theoretical framework to guide coding. RESULTS: The implementation process proved to be highly dynamic, non-linear, and influenced by many factors. These could be divided into attributes of the innovations/adopters, the implementation process, and the organization. The context determined the speed, quality, and direction of the process and how a factor affected the process. CONCLUSIONS: We identified specific features of PGME innovation: the challenge of implementing other competencies than that of the medical expert; the importance of regional implementation strategies and educational support; the balance between training and patient care; and the need for regional inter-organizational networks of hospitals. The authors recommend: design the curriculum with the needs of the users in mind; facilitate knowledge sharing; organize educational support; translate the national curriculum to the local workplace; and promote regional inter-organizational networks between hospitals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2012.670325

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Historically, faculty development in feedback delivery has been the primary approach to improving the quality and effectiveness of feedback.

    “Historically, faculty development in feedback delivery has been the primary approach to improving the quality and effectiveness of feedback [29, 73].”
  • Different individual trainees may respond to different approaches.

    “Although no one technique of giving feedback has proven superiority and different individual trainees may respond to different approaches, there is evidence that it has been helpful to train supervisors in techniques of providing feedback constructively, and their behaviour changes in providing more useful feedback [73].”
  • No one technique of giving feedback has proven superiority.

    “Although no one technique of giving feedback has proven superiority and different individual trainees may respond to different approaches, there is evidence that it has been helpful to train supervisors in techniques of providing feedback constructively, and their behaviour changes in providing more useful feedback [73].”
  • There is evidence that it has been helpful to train supervisors in techniques of providing feedback constructively.

    “Although no one technique of giving feedback has proven superiority and different individual trainees may respond to different approaches, there is evidence that it has been helpful to train supervisors in techniques of providing feedback constructively, and their behaviour changes in providing more useful feedback [73].”
  • Supervisors' behaviour changes in providing more useful feedback after training.

    “Although no one technique of giving feedback has proven superiority and different individual trainees may respond to different approaches, there is evidence that it has been helpful to train supervisors in techniques of providing feedback constructively, and their behaviour changes in providing more useful feedback [73].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. 2004. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations. Int J Qual Health Care 16(2):107-123.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jippes, E., Van Luijk, S. J., Pols, J., Achterkamp, M. C., Brand, P. L. P., & Van Engelen, J. M. L.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Jippes, E.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
e589-e602
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2161196238
Cited by
58
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 6
FWCI
4.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
competency-based medical education, graduate medical education, curriculum implementation, implementation barriers and facilitators, residency training, pediatric residency, obstetrics and gynecology residency, interorganizational networks, educational support, knowledge sharing, multilevel theory
MeSH terms
Competency-Based Education, Diffusion of Innovation, Education, Medical, Graduate, Gynecology, Humans, Netherlands, Obstetrics, Pediatrics, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review