Cited by 66Innovations in Medical EducationQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsInnovative Education and Learning Practices

The proof is in the pudding: Putting Actor-Network-Theory to work in medical education

Bleakley, Alan·2012·Medical Teacher

Abstract

What constitutes valid evidence from medical education research is typically grounded in the scientific paradigm of proof through experiment. Here, explanation through single meaning is privileged over exploration of multiple presentations of phenomena--short, interpretation eclipses appreciation. This approach is challenged as reductive by naturalistic qualitative methods such as rich ethnographic field reports, presented as narratives. Contemporary ethnographic approaches have entered medical education by a back door--disguised as a stable of 'social learning theories'. Communities of Practice theory, Activity Theory and Actor-Network-Theory (ANT) all serve as research practices forming identifiable contemporary ethnographies. 'Evidence' is conceived as exploratory rather than explanatory, through baroque descriptions of innovations in learning organizations, including medicine. ANT is then both a theory of innovation in organizations and an ethnographic method, where practice and theory coincide. ANT is interested primarily not in epistemologies, but in how a phenomenon such as an 'illness' is conceived across differing practices as multiple ontologies (experienced meanings), each meaning generated and suspended within a particular network of effects. How such networks are initiated and developed has significance for rethinking the nature of 'evidence', restoring faith in the value of a good story.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2012.671977

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bleakley, A.
Affiliations
Royal Cornwall Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Bleakley, Alan
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2012-04-10
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
462-467
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2156391211
Cited by
66
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
Keywords
actor-network theory, medical education research, ethnography, qualitative research, communities of practice, activity theory, social learning theory, learning organization, organizational innovation, multiple ontologies, epistemology of evidence
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Communication, Education, Professional, Health Personnel, Humans, Learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review