CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 309Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsMedical Education and Admissions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?

Patrício, Madalena Folque, Julião, Miguel, Fareleira, Filipa, Carneiro, António Vaz·2013·Medical Teacher
DOI 10.3109/0142159x.2013.774330
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) was introduced by Harden et al. (1975) trying to answer the problems regarding the assessment of clinical competencies. Despite increasingly widespread use of OSCEs, debate continues with arguments as 'why using such a demanding format if other methods are available?' AIM: To review and synthesize evidence on technical and economic feasibility of OSCE in undergraduate medical studies. METHODS: Best Evidence Medical Education methodology was applied by two independent coders to 1083 studies identified by literature search from 1975 until the end of 2008. KEY FINDINGS: The OSCE is a feasible approach to the assessment of clinical competence for use in different cultural and geographical contexts; to assess a wide range of learning outcomes; in different specialties and disciplines; for formative and summative purposes; to assess students a curriculum or an educational intervention; in the different phases of education including the early and later years of the undergraduate curriculum; and in different health care professions. CONCLUSION: Despite being an expensive test format, evidence suggests that the use of OSCE produces reliable results. The study also suggests that one reason for the wide-scale adoption of the OSCE and the feasibility of its use in different contexts and situations is its inherent flexibility in terms of the number of students that can be assessed, the number of examiners included, the type of patients represented and the format of the examination itself, including the length of the examination, the number and duration of stations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2013.774330

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 39 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Azcuenga J, 1998, Cost analysis of three clinical skills assessment (CSA) projects
  2. Battles JB, 1992, J Biocommun, 19, 19
  3. Feather A, 1997, Educ Health, 10, 333
  4. Geddes EL, 1998, Physiother Can, 50, 269
  5. Grand’ Maison P, 1985, Proc Annu Conf Res Med Educ, 24, 65
  6. Joorabchi B, 1991, Am J Dis Child, 145, 757
  7. Kenkel P, 2004. Feasibility Assessment Templates for producers and Cooperatives. 2004 Triennial Conference Change in the rural America Social and Management Changes. Four Points Sheraton Hotel Lexington
  8. Szerlip H, 1998, Development and Implementation of a Pelvic Examination Station for a High-Stakes OSCE
  9. Vooijs MEEC, 1997, Educ Health, 10, 69

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 307

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Patrício, M. F., Julião, M., Fareleira, F., & Carneiro, A. V.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Patrício, Madalena Folque
ORCID
Venue
Medical Teacher
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2013-03-22
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
503-514
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
DOI
10.3109/0142159x.2013.774330
OpenAlex
W2081134712
Cited by
309
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
OSCE, clinical competence assessment, undergraduate medical education, assessment feasibility, assessment reliability, formative assessment, summative assessment
MeSH terms
Clinical Competence, Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Specialization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review