Cited by 1,687Innovations in Medical EducationClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsMedical Education and Admissions

Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.

Open access
Harden, R M, Stevenson, M, Downie, W W, Wilson, G M·1975·BMJ

Abstract

To avoid many of the disadvantages of the traditional clinical examination we have introduced the structured clinical examination. In this students rotate round a series of stations in the hospital ward. At one station they are asked to carry out a procedure, such as take a history, undertake one aspect of physical examination, or interpret laboratory investigations in the light of a patient's problem, and at the next station they have to answer questions on the findings at the previous station and their interpretation. As they cannot go back to check on omissions multiple-choice questions have a minimal cueing effect. The students may be observed and scored at some stations by examiners using a check list. In the structured clinical examination the variables and complexity of the examination are more easily controlled, its aims can be more clearly defined, and more of the student's knowledge can be tested. The examination is more objective and a marking strategy can be decided in advance. The examination results in improved feed-back to students and staff.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.1.5955.447

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • OSCE attempts to objectively assess the clinical skills of medical students using representative, simulated clinical scenarios.

    “An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) attempts to objectively assess the clinical skills of medical students using representative, simulated clinical scenarios [Harden et al., 1975, Khan et al., 2013].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Fleming, P. R., et al., British Medical Journal, 1974, 2, 99.
  2. 3Wilson, G. M., et al., Lancet, 1969, 1, 37.
  3. 4Hubbard, J. P., et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 1965, 272, 1321.
  4. Charvat, J., McGuire, C., and Parsons, V., A review of the nature and uses of Examinations in Medical Education, Public Health Papers No. 36. Geneva, W.H.O., 1968.
  5. 7Marshall, V. R., and Lubrook, J., British Journal of Medical Education, 1972, 6, 212.
  6. Lever, R., et al., British Journal of Medical Education, 1970, 4, 37.
  7. Harden, R. McG,. Lever, R., and Wilson, G. M., Lancet, 1969, 1, 40.
  8. McCarthy, W. H., Jrournal of Medical Education, 1966, 41, 263.
  9. Walton, H. J., British,Journal of Medical Education, 1967, 1, 330.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Harden, R. M., Stevenson, M., Downie, W. W., & Wilson, G. M.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1975-02-22
Volume
1
Issue
5955
Pages
447-451
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2013488675
Cited by
1,687
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 93 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 56
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
Keywords
OSCE, clinical competence assessment, medical students, structured clinical examination, multiple-choice questions, cueing effects, checklists, feedback to students, medical education
MeSH terms
Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Medical History Taking, Physical Examination, Physician-Patient Relations, Scotland, Clinical Laboratory Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review