Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination.
Open accessAbstract
To avoid many of the disadvantages of the traditional clinical examination we have introduced the structured clinical examination. In this students rotate round a series of stations in the hospital ward. At one station they are asked to carry out a procedure, such as take a history, undertake one aspect of physical examination, or interpret laboratory investigations in the light of a patient's problem, and at the next station they have to answer questions on the findings at the previous station and their interpretation. As they cannot go back to check on omissions multiple-choice questions have a minimal cueing effect. The students may be observed and scored at some stations by examiners using a check list. In the structured clinical examination the variables and complexity of the examination are more easily controlled, its aims can be more clearly defined, and more of the student's knowledge can be tested. The examination is more objective and a marking strategy can be decided in advance. The examination results in improved feed-back to students and staff.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
OSCE attempts to objectively assess the clinical skills of medical students using representative, simulated clinical scenarios.
“An Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) attempts to objectively assess the clinical skills of medical students using representative, simulated clinical scenarios [Harden et al., 1975, Khan et al., 2013].”
From LLM-Powered Virtual Patient Agents for Interactive Clinical Skills Training with Automated Feedback (2025) · cites this paper as Harden et al., 1975
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Fleming, P. R., et al., British Medical Journal, 1974, 2, 99.
- 3Wilson, G. M., et al., Lancet, 1969, 1, 37.
- 4Hubbard, J. P., et al., New England Journal of Medicine, 1965, 272, 1321.
- Charvat, J., McGuire, C., and Parsons, V., A review of the nature and uses of Examinations in Medical Education, Public Health Papers No. 36. Geneva, W.H.O., 1968.
- 7Marshall, V. R., and Lubrook, J., British Journal of Medical Education, 1972, 6, 212.
- Lever, R., et al., British Journal of Medical Education, 1970, 4, 37.
- Harden, R. McG,. Lever, R., and Wilson, G. M., Lancet, 1969, 1, 40.
- McCarthy, W. H., Jrournal of Medical Education, 1966, 41, 263.
- Walton, H. J., British,Journal of Medical Education, 1967, 1, 330.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE)
HARDEN, R. M., & GLEESON, F. A. (1979) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.1979.tb00918.x · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Self-citationIs the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?
Patrício, M. F., Julião, M., Fareleira, F., & Carneiro, A. V. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.774330 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Objective structured clinical examination: the assessment of choice
Zayyan, M. (2011) · Oman Medical journal · doi:10.5001/omj.2011.55 · Cited by 295 · see citing works
Lee, E., Kourgiantakis, T., & Bogo, M. (2020) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2019.1620723 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Assessment of practical skills: The objective structured practical examination (OSPE)
Harden, R. M., & Cairncross, R. G. (1980) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075078012331377216 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationObjective structured clinical examination for teaching and assessment: Evidence-based critique
Dewan, P., Khalil, S., & Gupta, P. (2024) · Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health · doi:10.1016/j.cegh.2023.101477 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Ataro, G., Worku, S., & Asaminew, T. (2020) · Ethiopian Journal of Health Sciences · doi:10.4314/ejhs.v30i3.13 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Feedback in the OSCE: What Do Residents Remember?
Humphrey-Murto, S., Mihok, M., Pugh, D., Touchie, C., Halman, S., & Wood, T. J. (2016) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1107487 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Bogo, M., Kourgiantakis, T., Burns, D., King, B., & Lee, E. (2021) · Clinical Social Work Journal · doi:10.1007/s10615-020-00777-6 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Butler, K. L., Hirsh, D. A., Petrusa, E. R., Yeh, D. D., Stearns, D., Sloane, D. E., Linder, J. A., Basu, G., Thompson, L. A., & de Moya, M. A. (2017) · Journal of Surgical Education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.08.018 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Task model-specific operator skill assessment in routine fetal ultrasound scanning
Wang, Y., Yang, Q., Drukker, L., Papageorghiou, A., Hu, Y., & Noble, J. A. (2022) · International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery · doi:10.1007/s11548-022-02642-y · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Horita, S., Park, Y.-S., Son, D., & Eto, M. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02520-2 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Kfoury, P., Maalouf, F., Nasser, F., Gulgulian, T., & Charafeddine, L. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.64677 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
LLM-Powered Virtual Patient Agents for Interactive Clinical Skills Training with Automated Feedback
Voigt, H., Sugamiya, Y., Lawonn, K., Zarrieß, S., & Takanishi, A. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.13943
- Authors
- Harden, R. M., Stevenson, M., Downie, W. W., & Wilson, G. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Dundee (GB)
- ORCID
- Harden, R M
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1975-02-22
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 5955
- Pages
- 447-451
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2013488675
- Cited by
- 1,687
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 93 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 97 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 123 · 2020: 83 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 66 · 2017: 68 · 2016: 68 · 2015: 74 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 3.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical Education and Admissions
- Keywords
- OSCE, clinical competence assessment, medical students, structured clinical examination, multiple-choice questions, cueing effects, checklists, feedback to students, medical education
- MeSH terms
- Education, Medical, Undergraduate, Educational Measurement, Medical History Taking, Physical Examination, Physician-Patient Relations, Scotland, Clinical Laboratory Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review