Cited by 45Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychiatric care and mental health servicesElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

A self-destructive care: self-reports of people who experienced coercive measures and their suggestions for alternatives

Looi, Git-Marie Ejneborn, Engström, Åsa, Sävenstedt, Stefan·2015·Issues in Mental Health Nursing

Abstract

Coercive measures are commonly used as a method of intervention, despite insufficient evidence for their effectiveness and benefits. The aim of this study was to describe how people who self-harm perceive alternatives to coercive measures in relation to actual experiences of psychiatric care. A total of 19 self-reports have been analysed with qualitative content analysis, resulting in three categories: a wish for understanding instead of neglect; a wish for mutual relation instead of distrust; a wish for professionalism instead of a counterproductive care. In conclusion, if the caregivers can understand and collaborate with the patient, there is seldom any need for coercive measures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/01612840.2014.951134

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 45

Authors
Looi, G.-M. E., Engström, Å., & Sävenstedt, S.
Affiliations
Luleå University of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Looi, Git-Marie Ejneborn
Venue
Issues in Mental Health Nursing
Published
2015-01-27
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
96-103
ISSN
  • 0161-2840 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-4673
OpenAlex
W2107512504
Cited by
45
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4
FWCI
4.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Issues in Mental Health Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
coercive measures, self-harm, alternatives to coercion, psychiatric nursing, patient experience, bidirectional relationship, professional care, caregiver-patient relationship
MeSH terms
Coercion, Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders, Female, Humans, Injections, Nurse-Patient Relations, Physician-Patient Relations, Restraint, Physical, Suicide, Attempted, Sweden, Antipsychotic Agents, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Trust, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review