The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dose Response of the Pulmonary Macrophagic System to Various Particulates and Its Relationship to Transepithelial Passage of Free Particles
Abstract
Alveolar macrophages are thought to arise from both marrow-derived monocytes and pulmonary interstitial cells. Macrophage kinetics are now studied under various conditions of alveolar loading using several doses of carbon (0.03 micrometers diameter), polystyrene latex (0.1 and 1.0 micrometers), and heat-killed bacteria. In serial studies we examined the number of macrophages recovered by lavage, DNA synthesis by lung cells on autoradiographs, and the passage of free particles into lung tissues by electron microscopy. The dual origin of the alveolar macrophage was confirmed for each particulate. The observed peak in macrophagic output at 1 day may be explained by monocytic egress. With greater loads, the peak value did not increase, but the continuing macrophagic production correlated with a period of interstitial cell proliferation. For all particles used, the number of new macrophages was related more closely to number of particles instilled than to the total dose by weight delivered to the lungs. With increasing number, more free particles of carbon and latex crossed the Type 1 epithelium to be phagocytized by interstitial macrophages. The results suggest that the adaptive outpouring of alveolar macrophages occurs by an acceleration of the normal biphasic pathway; when the adaptive response is prolonged, the interstitial compartment appears to be the predominant source of new cells.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As discussed in our previous paper [59], numerous authors provided evidence that epithelial type 1 cells (EC1) can endocytose NP at the epithelial surface and eventually exocytose those towards the baso-lateral side at the end of the last century, including the review of Lehnert [61] and papers by Adamson and Bowden [62–64].”
From Particle toxicology and health - where are we? (2019) · cites this paper as [63]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- 10.1056/NEJM197404182901603 · DOI
- Bowden D H, 1972, Am J Pathol, 68, 521
- Volkman A, 1976, J Reticulo-endothel Soc, 19, 249
- 10.1084/jem.149.6.1504 · DOI
- Bowden D H, 1980, Lab Invest, 42, 511
- Adamson I YR, 1980, Lab Invest, 42, 518
- Bowden D H, 1978, Lab Invest, 38, 422
- Brain JD, 1971, Inhaled Particles, 111
- 10.3109/01902148009057510 · DOI
- Adamson I YR, 1978, Lab Invest, 38, 430
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deposition and biokinetics of inhaled nanoparticles
Geiser, M., & Kreyling, W. G. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-2 · Cited by 747
Possible mechanisms to explain dust overloading of the lungs
MORROW, P. (1988) · Fundamental and Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0272-0590(88)90284-9 · Cited by 500
Particle toxicology and health - where are we?
Riediker, M., Zink, D., Kreyling, W., Oberdörster, G., Elder, A., Graham, U., Lynch, I., Duschl, A., Ichihara, G., Ichihara, S., et al. (2019) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/s12989-019-0302-8 · Cited by 237
Lung Clearance of Inhaled Insoluble and Soluble Particles
OBERDÖRSTER, G. (1988) · Journal of Aerosol Medicine · doi:10.1089/jam.1988.1.289 · Cited by 157
Dosimetric Comparisons of Particle Deposition and Retention in Rats and Humans
Brown, J. S., Wilson, W. E., & Grant, L. D. (2005) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370590929475 · Cited by 131
Nakane, H. (2012) · Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12199-011-0252-8 · Cited by 101
Driscoll, K. E., & Maurer, J. K. (1991) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623391019004-108 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Adamson, I. Y. R., & Bowden, D. H.
- Venue
- Experimental Lung Research
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1981-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 165-175
- ISSN
- 0190-2148
- 1521-0499
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review