Cited by 154Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesMental Health Treatment and AccessPsychiatric care and mental health services

Accident and emergency staff's perceptions of deliberate self‐harm: Attributions, emotions and willingness to help

Mackay, Nadine, Barrowclough, Christine·2005·British Journal of Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Objectives The study applied Weiner's (1980, 1986) attributional model of helping behaviour to Accident and Emergency (A&E) staff's care of patients presenting with deliberate self-harm. It was hypothesized that where staff attributed precipitants of the act of deliberate self-harm to controllable, internal, and stable patient factors, then staff would display greater negative affect, less optimism, and less willingness to help the patient. Design Using four hypothetical scenarios in a two-factor between-subjects design, contextual factors describing a self-harm patient were manipulated. Method Participants were 89 A&E medical and nursing staff. They were asked to rate attributions for the cause of the deliberate self-harm and their emotional responses, optimism for change, and willingness to help change the behaviour. Their general attitudes towards deliberate self-harm patients and perceived needs for training in the care of these patients were also assessed. Results The findings were consistent with Weiner's attributional model of helping. The greater attributions of controllability, the greater the negative affect of staff towards the person, and the less the propensity to help. The higher the ratings of stability of outcome, the less staff optimism for the success of their input. Male staff and medical staff had more negative attitudes, and medical staff saw less need for further training. Conclusion Formulating A&E staff's responses to deliberate self-harm using a cogni…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1348/014466505x29620

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mackay 2005 found the greater the attributions of controllability to self-harming patients, the less the propensity to help.

    “The greater the attributions of controllability to self-harming patients, the greater the negative affect of staff towards the patient as measured across subjects, and the less the propensity to help.”
  • Mackay 2005 found the greater the attributions of controllability to self-harming patients, the greater the negative affect of staff towards the patient as measured across subjects.

    “The greater the attributions of controllability to self-harming patients, the greater the negative affect of staff towards the patient as measured across subjects, and the less the propensity to help.”
  • Many assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians and by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work.

    “many of the assumption studies attempted to make their vignettes as realistic as possible by having them validated by clinicians [25–41] and also by having participants view/read the vignettes as part of a normal day at work [27–36, 39, 41].”
  • In one study, male staff were significantly less sympathetic and more frustrated than female staff with self-harming patients presenting in A&E.

    “In one study, male staff were significantly less sympathetic and more frustrated than female staff with self-harming patients presenting in A&E [26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mackay, N., & Barrowclough, C.
Affiliations
  • Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Manchester (GB)
Corresponding author
Barrowclough, Christine
Venue
British Journal of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-06
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
255-267
ISSN
  • 0144-6657 (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8260
OpenAlex
W2113682793
Cited by
154
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
self-harm, helping behavior, employee attitudes, negative affect, optimism, willingness to help, staff training needs, employee perceptions
MeSH terms
Workforce, Adult, Affect, Attitude of Health Personnel, Attitude to Health, Emergency Medical Services, Female, Helping Behavior, Humans, Male, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Injurious Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review