Cited by 161Corneal surgery and disordersCollagen: Extraction and CharacterizationCorneal Surgery and Treatments

The organisation of collagen fibrils in the human corneal stroma: a synchrotron X-ray diffraction study

Meek, Keith M., Blamires, Trudi, Elliott, Gerald F., Gyi, Tracy J., Nave, Colin·1987·Current Eye Research

Abstract

The low angle equatorial diffraction pattern from the human corneal stroma shows that the collagen fibrils have two preferred orientations: inferior-superior and medial-lateral. We have not observed this effect in any other animal species. This arrangement, which was found to be more pronounced in the posterior than in the anterior stroma, was maintained until the last 1 to 2 millimetres before the limbus at which point uniaxial orientation was observed along the circumference. Our interpretation of this result is that most collagen fibrils wrap around the circumference of the cornea and relatively few continue radially into the limbus where uniformity of collagen fibril diameters is lost.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/02713688709034853

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collagen lamellae in the deeper stroma have preferred directions that appear to be close to the inferior-superior and nasal-temporal directions.

    “Collagen lamellae in the deeper stroma (Fig. 1a) have preferred directions, which appear to be close to the inferior-superior and nasal-temporal directions (Meek et al., 1987, Aghamohammadzadeh et al., 2004, Abahussin et al., 2009, Kamma-Lorger et al., 2010).”

    From Corneal structure and transparency (2015) · cites this paper as Meek et al., 1987

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meek, K. M., Blamires, T., Elliott, G. F., Gyi, T. J., & Nave, C.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Daresbury Laboratory (GB)
Venue
Current Eye Research
Published
1987-01
Volume
6
Issue
7
Pages
841-846
ISSN
  • 0271-3683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2202
OpenAlex
W2047053579
Cited by
161
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Eye Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Collagen: Extraction and Characterization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
Keywords
collagen fibrils, corneal stroma, fibril orientation, low-angle X-ray diffraction, limbus, fibril diameter, human cornea
MeSH terms
Aged, Collagen, Cornea, Corneal Stroma, Humans, Middle Aged, Particle Accelerators, X-Ray Diffraction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review