The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of the Inhalation Technique in Outpatients with Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using a Metered-Dose Inhaler or Dry Powder Device
Abstract
Inhaled medication is commonly prescribed for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but is often not properly used by patients. A total of 316 patients suffering from asthma or COPD took part in a study that evaluated how patients utilized their metered-dose inhaler (MDI) or dry powder inhaler, using a standardized inhaler checklist. Two hundred eighty-one patients (88.9%) made at least one mistake in the inhalation technique. The mistakes were classified into skill and nonskill mistakes. Two hundred patients made one or more skill mistakes and 81 patients only made one or more nonskill mistakes. The most common skill error was "not continuing to inhale slowly after activation of the canister" (69.6%). The nonskill item most patients had difficulties with was "exhale before the inhalation" (65.8%). Patients who used an MDI made significantly fewer nonskill mistakes than patients using a dry powder device. Older patients had more difficulty with the correct use of the inhaler than younger patients. There was no difference in errors between men and women. In this patient sample, most patients failed to use their inhaler correctly. Regular instructions and checkups of inhalation technique are the responsibility of the physician and should be a standard and routine procedure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Systematic Review of Errors in Inhaler Use
Sanchis, J., Gich, I., & Pedersen, S. (2016) · CHEST · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.041 · Cited by 538
Medication adherence issues in patients treated for COPD
Restrepo, R. (2008) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s3036 · Cited by 407
Brocklebank, D., Ram, F., Wright, J., Barry, P., Cates, C., Davies, L., Douglas, G., Muers, M., Smith, D., & White, J. (2001) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta5260 · Cited by 401
Walia, M., Paul, L., Satyavani, A., Lodha, R., Kalaivani, M., & Kabra, S. K. (2006) · Pediatric Pulmonology · doi:10.1002/ppul.20498 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- van Beerendonk, I., Mesters, I., Mudde, A. N., & Tan, T. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Asthma
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 273-279
- ISSN
- 0277-0903 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-4303
- OpenAlex
- W2112718944
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of the Inhalation Technique in Outpatients with Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using a Metered-Dose Inhaler or Dry Powder Device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02770909809068218
- The paper
- van Beerendonk, I., Mesters, I., Mudde, A. N., & Tan, T. D. (1998). Assessment of the Inhalation Technique in Outpatients with Asthma or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Using a Metered-Dose Inhaler or Dry Powder Device. Journal of Asthma. https://doi.org/10.3109/02770909809068218
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.