The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy
Open accessAbstract
When analysis of results of radiotherapy for nearly 500 patients with oropharyngeal cancer showed evidence for rapid tumor regrowth during extensions of treatment from about 5 weeks to about 8 weeks, we searched the literature on radiotherapy for head and neck cancer to determine whether it revealed similar evidence of accelerated tumor regrowth. Estimates of doses to achieve local control in 50% of cases (TCD50) were made from published local control rates, and the dependence of these doses on overall treatment duration was evaluated. In parallel, published scattergrams were analyzed to estimate the rate of tumor regrowth over the period of 4-10 weeks from initiation of therapy. Both analyses suggested that, on average, clonogen repopulation in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck accelerates only after a lag period of the order of 4 +/- 1 weeks after initiation of radiotherapy and that a dose increment of about 0.6 Gy per day is required to compensate for this repopulation. Such a dose increment is consistent with a 4-day clonogen doubling rate, compared with a median of about 60 days in published reports of unperturbed tumor growth rates. The values presented here are average values for a large number of patients: it is necessary, not only to verify the results of these retrospective analyses in prospective studies, but also to develop methods to predict the time of onset and rate of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation in the individual patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RADIOTHERAPY AND HYPERBARIC OXYGEN IN HEAD AND NECK CANCER
Henk, J. M., Kunkler, P. B., & Smith, C. W. (1977) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(77)90116-7 · Cited by 229
Cited by
Peng, G., Wang, T., Yang, K.-Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, T., Li, Q., Han, J., & Wu, G. (2012) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2012.08.013 · Cited by 624
Peters, L. J., Goepfert, H., Ang, K. K., Byers, R. M., Maor, M. H., Guillamondegui, O., Morrison, W. H., Weber, R. S., Garden, A. S., Frankenthaler, R. A., et al. (1993) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(93)90167-t · Cited by 538
Robert, F., Ezekiel, M. P., Spencer, S. A., Meredith, R. F., Bonner, J. A., Khazaeli, M. B., Saleh, M. N., Carey, D., LoBuglio, A. F., Wheeler, R. H., et al. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2001.19.13.3234 · Cited by 474
Overgaard, J. (2011) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.004 · Cited by 456
Fuks, Z., Leibel, S. A., Wallner, K. E., Begg, C. B., Fair, W. R., Anderson, L. L., Hilaris, B. S., & Whitmore, W. F. (1991) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/0360-3016(91)90668-t · Cited by 448
Metadata
- Authors
- Withers, H. R., Taylor, J. M. G., & Maciejewski, B.
- Venue
- Acta Oncologica
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-146
- ISSN
- 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1651-226X
- OpenAlex
- W2105150213
- Cited by
- 1,601
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 69.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02841868809090333
- The paper
- Withers, H. R., Taylor, J. M. G., & Maciejewski, B. (1988). The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. Acta Oncologica. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841868809090333
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.