Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 474

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phase I Study of Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Cetuximab in Combination With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Robert, Francisco, Ezekiel, Mark P., Spencer, Sharon A., Meredith, Ruby F., Bonner, James A., Khazaeli, M. B., Saleh, Mansoor N., Carey, Delicia, LoBuglio, Albert F., Wheeler, Richard H., Cooper, Michael R., Waksal, Harlan W.·2001·Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of a chimeric anti–epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody, cetuximab, in combination with radiation therapy (RT) in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated 16 patients in five successive treatment schedules. A standard dose escalation procedure was used; three patients entered onto the study at each dose level of cetuximab received conventional RT (70 Gy, 2 Gy/d), and the final three patients received hyperfractionated RT (76.8 Gy, 1.2 Gy bid). Cetuximab was delivered as a loading dose of 100 to 500 mg/m 2, followed by weekly infusions of 100 to 250 mg/m 2 for 7 to 8 weeks. Circulating levels of cetuximab during therapy were determined using a biomolecular interaction analysis core instrument. Human antichimeric antibody response was evaluated with a double-antigen radiometric assay. The recommended phase II/III dose was defined as the optimal cetuximab dose level based on the pharmacologic parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: The most commonly reported adverse events were fever, asthenia, transaminase elevation, nausea, and skin toxicities (grade 1 to 2 in most patients). Skin toxicity outside of the RT field was not strictly dose-dependent; however, grade 2 or higher events were observed in patients treated with higher dose regimens. There was one grade 4 allergic reaction. Most acute adverse effects were associated with RT (xerostomia, mucositis, and local skin toxicity). No antibodies against cetuximab were detected. All patients achieved an objective response (13 complete and two partial remissions). CONCLUSION: Cetuximab can be safely administered with RT. The recommended dose for phase II/III studies is a loading dose of 400 to 500 mg/m 2 and a maintenance weekly dose of 250 mg/m 2.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jco.2001.19.13.3234

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 474

Metadata

Authors
Robert, F., Ezekiel, M. P., Spencer, S. A., Meredith, R. F., Bonner, J. A., Khazaeli, M. B., Saleh, M. N., Carey, D., LoBuglio, A. F., Wheeler, R. H., Cooper, M. R., & Waksal, H. W.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2001-07-01
Volume
19
Issue
13
Pages
3234-3243
ISSN
  • 0732-183X (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-7755
OpenAlex
W2167531081
Cited by
474
References
32
FWCI
43.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phase I Study of Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Cetuximab in Combination With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1200/jco.2001.19.13.3234
The paper
Robert, F., Ezekiel, M. P., Spencer, S. A., Meredith, R. F., Bonner, J. A., Khazaeli, M. B., Saleh, M. N., Carey, D., LoBuglio, A. F., Wheeler, R. H., Cooper, M. R., & Waksal, H. W. (2001). Phase I Study of Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Antibody Cetuximab in Combination With Radiation Therapy in Patients With Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2001.19.13.3234

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.