The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measurement of Human Tumour Oxygenation Status by a Polarographic Needle Electrode: An analysis of inter- and intratumour heterogeneity
Open accessAbstract
Tumour oxygenation status was measured by a polarographic needle electrode in 31 patients with lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and 18 patients with primary soft tissue sarcoma. Two oxygenation parameters, the median pO2 and the proportion of measured values less than 5 mm Hg, were used in comparing the inter- and intrasubject heterogeneity in tumour and subcutaneous tissue. Results of the analysis may be summarized as follows: 1) the variation in oxygenation between tumours was significantly greater than that within tumours, 2) the variation in oxygenation of subcutaneous tissue between patients was significantly greater than the variation within patients, 3) oxygenation of tumour was significantly lower than that of subcutaneous tissue, 4) no significant difference in the distribution of the oxygenation parameters in the two tumour types, and 5) both oxygenation parameters correlated. In conclusion, measurements by oxygen electrodes were able to distinguish intratumour heterogeneity from intertumour heterogeneity provided that several electrode tracks were done. The method therefore appears to be feasible for differentiation of tumour oxygenation clinically.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Exploiting tumour hypoxia in cancer treatment
Brown, J. M., & Wilson, W. R. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1367 · Cited by 2,828
(1996) · PubMed · Cited by 1,188
Defining normoxia, physoxia and hypoxia in tumours—implications for treatment response
McKeown, S. R. (2014) · The British Journal of Radiology · doi:10.1259/bjr.20130676 · Cited by 1,050
Nordsmark, M., Bentzen, S. M., Rudat, V., Brizel, D., Lartigau, E., Stadler, P., Becker, A., Adam, M., Molls, M., Dunst, J., et al. (2005) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.06.038 · Cited by 953
Self-citationNordsmark, M., Overgaard, M., & Overgaard, J. (1996) · Radiotherapy and Oncology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8140(96)91811-3 · Cited by 942
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordsmark, M., Bentzen, S. M., & Overgaard, J.
- Venue
- Acta Oncologica
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 383-389
- ISSN
- 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1651-226X
- OpenAlex
- W2157633101
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measurement of Human Tumour Oxygenation Status by a Polarographic Needle Electrode: An analysis of inter- and intratumour heterogeneity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/02841869409098433
- The paper
- Nordsmark, M., Bentzen, S. M., & Overgaard, J. (1994). Measurement of Human Tumour Oxygenation Status by a Polarographic Needle Electrode: An analysis of inter- and intratumour heterogeneity. Acta Oncologica. https://doi.org/10.3109/02841869409098433
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.