Cited by 99Cancer survivorship and careWomen's cancer prevention and managementFamily Support in Illness

Trajectories of distress, anxiety, and depression among women with breast cancer: Looking beyond the mean

Open access
Bidstrup, Pernille Envold, Christensen, Jane, Mertz, Birgitte Goldschmidt, Rottmann, Nina, Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg, Johansen, Christoffer·2015·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the development of psychological wellbeing over time among women who have been treated for breast cancer. The aim of this study was to identify distinct patterns of distress, anxiety, and depression in such women. METHODS: We invited 426 consecutive women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer to participate in this study, and 323 (76%) provided information on distress ('distress thermometer') and on symptoms of anxiety and depression ('hospital anxiety and depression scale'). Semiparametric group-based mixture modeling was used to identify distinct trajectories of distress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms assessed the week before surgery and four and eight months later. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the characteristics of women in the distinct groups. RESULTS: Although no sub-group of women with chronic severe anxiety or depressive symptoms was found, we did identify a sub-group of 8% of the women who experienced continuously severe distress. Young age, having a partner, shorter education, and receiving chemotherapy but not radiotherapy might characterize women whose psychological symptoms remain strong eight months after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: By looking beyond the mean, we found that 8% of the women experienced chronic severe distress; no sub-groups with chronic severe anxiety or depression were identified. Several socio-demographic and treatment factors characterized the women whose distress level remained severe eight months after diagnosis. The results suggest that support could be focused on relatively small groups of patients most in need.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0284186x.2014.1002571

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distress is most common during active treatment.

    “While an estimated 35–45% of cancer patients report psychological distress [1, 12], distress is most common during active treatment [13, 14].”

    From Being present: A single-arm feasibility study of audio-based mindfulness meditation for colorectal cancer patients and caregivers (2018) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Depression section reports that distress symptoms generally decreased from before surgery to four and eight months afterward, consistent with greater distress earlier in the breast-cancer course. But the study does not establish that distress is most common specifically during active treatment: its first assessment was before surgery, and it does not compare active-treatment and post-treatment prevalence across cancer patients. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. patients: Challenges and opportunities. J Clin oncol 2007;25:4526-7.
  2. mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociolog method Res 2001;29:374-93. nagin DS. analysing developmental trajectories: a semi-
  3. parametric, group-based approach. Psychol method 1999; 4:139-57.
  4. underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? am Psychol 2004;59:20-8.
  5. of distress thermometer and other ultra-short methods of detecting cancer-related mood disorders. J Clin oncol 2007;25:4670-81.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bidstrup, P. E., Christensen, J., Mertz, B. G., Rottmann, N., Dalton, S. O., & Johansen, C.
Affiliations
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
Corresponding author
Bidstrup, Pernille Envold
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2015-03-11
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
789-796
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2134128362
Cited by
99
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 2
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Oncologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Kræftens Bekæmpelse
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Family Support in Illness
Keywords
breast cancer, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, depressive symptoms, longitudinal trajectories, newly diagnosed breast cancer, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, sociodemographic factors, psychological well-being
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Agents, Anxiety, Breast Neoplasms, Denmark, Depression, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Postoperative Period, Surveys and Questionnaires, Radiotherapy, Referral and Consultation, Regression Analysis, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Marital Status, Preoperative Period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review