Cited by 43Bone and Dental Protein StudiesEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of Substrate Nature and Immobilization of Implanted Dentin Matrix Components During Induction of Reparative Dentinogenesis

Smith, A. J., Tobias, R. S., Cassidy, N., Bégue-Kirn, C., Ruch, J. V., Lesot, H.·1995·Connective Tissue Research

Abstract

The biological effects of isolated soluble dentin extracellular matrix components on the induction of reparative dentinogenesis in exposed cavities in ferret canine teeth have been shown to be blocked by immobilizing the extracellular matrix components on nitrocellulose or Millipore membranes during implantation. This contrasts with the picture of induction of odontoblast-like cell differentiation and reparative dentin deposition on existing insoluble dentin matrix of the exposure walls when the extracellular matrix components are implanted in lyophilized form. These data indicate the importance of an existing insoluble dentin matrix in providing a substrate to potentiate the growth factor-like activity of soluble isolated dentin extracellular matrix components in the induction of reparative dentinogenesis.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/03008209509013736

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bégue‐Kirn C., 1992, Int. J. Dev. Biol., 36, 491
  2. Lesot H., 1993, Cells and Materials, 3, 201
  3. Smith A. J., 1990, J. Biol. Buccale, 18, 123
  4. Baume L. J. Monographs in Oral Science, H. M. Myers, S. Karger. AC, Basel 1980; Vol. 8: 67–182
  5. Cam Y., 1986, Arch. Anat. Micr. Morphol., 75, 75
  6. Magloire H., 1992, Proc. Finn. Dent. Soc., 88, 257

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 43

Metadata

Authors
Smith, A. J., Tobias, R. S., Cassidy, N., Bégue-Kirn, C., Ruch, J. V., & Lesot, H.
Affiliations
University of Birmingham (GB)
Venue
Connective Tissue Research
Published
1995-01
Volume
32
Issue
1-4
Pages
291-296
ISSN
  • 0300-8207 (ISSN-L)
  • 1607-8438
OpenAlex
W2148675359
Cited by
43
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Connective Tissue Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Bone and Dental Protein Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Periodontics › Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Keywords
reparative dentinogenesis, dentin matrix proteins, substrate effects, odontoblast differentiation, exposed root surfaces, dentin regeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Collodion, Cuspid, Dental Cavity Preparation, Dental Pulp, Dentin, Dentin, Secondary, Dentinogenesis, Extracellular Matrix, Ferrets, Foreign-Body Reaction, Growth Substances, Membranes, Artificial, Micropore Filters, Odontoblasts, Solubility, Giant Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review