The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development and use of molecular markers: past and present
Abstract
Molecular markers, due to their stability, cost-effectiveness and ease of use provide an immensely popular tool for a variety of applications including genome mapping, gene tagging, genetic diversity diversity, phylogenetic analysis and forensic investigations. In the last three decades, a number of molecular marker techniques have been developed and exploited worldwide in different systems. However, only a handful of these techniques, namely RFLPs, RAPDs, AFLPs, ISSRs, SSRs and SNPs have received global acceptance. A recent revolution in DNA sequencing techniques has taken the discovery and application of molecular markers to high-throughput and ultrahigh-throughput levels. Although, the choice of marker will obviously depend on the targeted use, microsatellites, SNPs and genotyping by sequencing (GBS) largely fulfill most of the user requirements. Further, modern transcriptomic and functional markers will lead the ventures onto high-density genetic map construction, identification of QTLs, breeding and conservation strategies in times to come in combination with other high throughput techniques. This review presents an overview of different marker technologies and their variants with a comparative account of their characteristic features and applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sequencing technologies – the next generation
Metzker, M. L. (2010) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg2626 · Cited by 7,066
Direct selection of human genomic loci by microarray hybridization
Albert, T. J., Molla, M. N., Muzny, D. M., Nazareth, L., Wheeler, D., Song, X., Richmond, T. A., Middle, C. M., Rodesch, M. J., Packard, C. J., et al. (2007) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth1111 · Cited by 681
Cited by
Biswas, P., & Kumar, N. (2023) · Molecular Marker Techniques · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-1612-2_12 · Cited by 29
Monica, H., & Kumaria, S. (2024) · Vegetos · doi:10.1007/s42535-024-01092-y · Cited by 6
Molecular Markers in the Management and Improvement of Forest Genetic Resources
Mohammad, N., Dahayat, A., & Agrahari, H. (2024) · Biotechnological Approaches for Sustaining Forest Trees and Their Products · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-4363-6_7 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Grover, A., & Sharma, P. C.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-11-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 290-302
- ISSN
- 0738-8551 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7801
- OpenAlex
- W1985632055
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and use of molecular markers: past and present. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07388551.2014.959891
- The paper
- Grover, A., & Sharma, P. C. (2016). Development and use of molecular markers: past and present. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388551.2014.959891
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.