Cited by 131Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of bacterial communities on biofuel-producing microalgae: stimulation, inhibition and harvesting

Wang, Hui, Hill, Russell T., Zheng, Tianling, Hu, Xiaoke, Wang, Bin·2016·Critical Reviews in Biotechnology

Abstract

Despite the great interest in microalgae as a potential source of biofuel to substitute for fossil fuels, little information is available on the effects of bacterial symbionts in mass algal cultivation systems. The bacterial communities associated with microalgae are a crucial factor in the process of microalgal biomass and lipid production and may stimulate or inhibit growth of biofuel-producing microalgae. In addition, we discuss here the potential use of bacteria to harvest biofuel-producing microalgae. We propose that aggregation of microalgae by bacteria to achieve >90% reductions in volume followed by centrifugation could be an economic approach for harvesting of biofuel-producing microalgae. Our aims in this review are to promote understanding of the effects of bacterial communities on microalgae and draw attention to the importance of this topic in the microalgal biofuel field.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07388551.2014.961402

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 118 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Gudin C, 1986, Adv Biotechnol Process, 6, 73
  2. Haystead A, 1970, Arch Microbiol, 74, 235
  3. Maruyama A, 1986, J Appl Microbiol, 61, 569
  4. Schafer H, 2002, FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 42, 25
  5. Ueda H, 2009, Microbiol Cult Coll, 25, 21

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 131

Metadata

Authors
Wang, H., Hill, R. T., Zheng, T., Hu, X., & Wang, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Xiamen University (CN)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Hui
Venue
Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
Published
2014-09-29
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
341-352
ISSN
  • 0738-8551 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7801
OpenAlex
W1970249036
Cited by
131
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Knowledge Repository of Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research, CAS (Yantai Institute of Coastal Zone Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
microalgae, bacterial communities, symbiotic bacteria, biofuel production, microalgal biomass, lipid production, algal growth stimulation, algal growth inhibition, microalgae harvesting
MeSH terms
Symbiosis, Biofuels, Microalgae, Microbial Consortia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review