Cited by 28Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

CTLA-4 CT60(rs3087243) polymorphism and autoimmune thyroid diseases susceptibility: a comprehensive meta-analysis

Ni, Jing, Qiu, Li-Juan, Zhang, Min, Wen, Peng-Fei, Ye, Xiao-Ran, Liang, Yan, Pan, Hai-Feng, Ye, Dong-Qing·2014·Endocrine Research

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) CT60 polymorphism (rs3087243) confers susceptibility to autoimmune thyroid disease (AITDs). METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed using: (1) allelic contrast, (2) recessive model and (3) dominant model. Electronic search of PubMed, Medline and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) was conducted to select studies. RESULTS: Finally, a total of 20 separate studies were available for the current meta-analysis: Graves' disease (GD): 18 studies including 1 Iranian, 6 Caucasian and 11 Asian populations; Hashimoto's thyroiditis (HT): seven studies including one Iranian, three Caucasian and three Asian populations. A significant association was found between the CTLA-4 CT60 polymorphism (rs3087243) and GD, with regard to comparisons between allele and genotype frequencies (all p < 0.001). After stratification by ethnicity, significant relationships were consistently identified both in Caucasian and Asian populations. Furthermore, the association between this allelic variant and HT risk was also found in overall and Asian populations (OR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.10-1.44; OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.19-1.76, respectively). CONCLUSION: Taken together, our study suggested that the CT60 polymorphism (rs3087243) in CTLA-4 gene might confer susceptibility to the AITDs (GD/HT).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07435800.2013.879167

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Polymorphism of CTLA-4 is known to increase the risk of autoimmune susceptibility including Graves' disease, but how it interacts with ICPis is unclear.

    “Polymorphism of CTLA-4 is known to increase the risk of autoimmune susceptibility including Graves’ disease, but how it interacts with ICPis is unclear [32,33,34].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ni, J., Qiu, L.-J., Zhang, M., Wen, P.-F., Ye, X.-R., Liang, Y., Pan, H.-F., & Ye, D.-Q.
Affiliations
Anhui Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Ye, Dong-Qing
Venue
Endocrine Research
Published
2014-04-03
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
180-188
ISSN
  • 0743-5800 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-4206
OpenAlex
W2085567820
Cited by
28
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrine Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
CTLA-4, rs3087243, autoimmune thyroid disease, Graves' disease, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, genetic susceptibility, CTLA-4 gene, genotype and allele frequencies
MeSH terms
Alleles, Gene Frequency, Graves Disease, Humans, Models, Genetic, Thyroid Gland, Autoimmunity, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Hashimoto Disease, Genetic Association Studies, CTLA-4 Antigen

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review