Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 765

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project

Open access
Mustalahti, Kirsi, Catassi, Carlo, Reunanen, Antti, Fabiani, Elisabetta, Heier, Margit, McMillan, Stan, Murray, Liam, Metzger, Marie-Helene, Gasparin, Maurizio, Bravi, Enzo, Mäki, Markku, the members of the Coeliac EU Cluster, Epidemiology·2010·Annals of Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) has been extensively investigated in recent years, an accurate estimate of CD frequency in the European population is still lacking. The aims of this study were: 1) to establish accurately the prevalence of CD in a large sample of the European population (Finland, Germany, Italy, and UK), including both children and adults; and 2) to investigate whether the prevalence of CD significantly varies between different areas of the European continent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were drawn from the four populations. All 29,212 participants were tested for CD by tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody test. Positive and border-line findings were further tested for serum endomysial antibodies (EMA). All serological determinations were centrally performed. Small-bowel biopsies were recommended to autoantibody-positive individuals. Previously diagnosed cases were identified. RESULTS: The overall CD prevalence (previously diagnosed plus anti-tTG and EMA positives) was 1.0% (95% CI 0.9-1.1). In subjects aged 30-64 years CD prevalence was 2.4% in Finland (2.0-2.8), 0.3% in Germany (0.1-0.4), and 0.7% in Italy (0.4-1.0). Sixty-eight percent of antibody-positive individuals showed small-bowel mucosal changes typical for CD (Marsh II/III lesion). CONCLUSIONS: CD is common in Europe. CD prevalence shows large unexplained differences in adult age across different European countries.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/07853890.2010.505931

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 765

Metadata

Authors
Mustalahti, K., Catassi, C., Reunanen, A., Fabiani, E., Heier, M., McMillan, S., Murray, L., Metzger, M.-H., Gasparin, M., Bravi, E., Mäki, M., & the members of the Coeliac EU Cluster, E.
Venue
Annals of Medicine
Published
2010-11-11
Volume
42
Issue
8
Pages
587-595
ISSN
  • 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2060
OpenAlex
W1980782171
Cited by
765
References
0
FWCI
36.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07853890.2010.505931
The paper
Mustalahti, K., Catassi, C., Reunanen, A., Fabiani, E., Heier, M., McMillan, S., Murray, L., Metzger, M.-H., Gasparin, M., Bravi, E., Mäki, M., & the members of the Coeliac EU Cluster, E. (2010). The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2010.505931

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.