The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Although the prevalence of celiac disease (CD) has been extensively investigated in recent years, an accurate estimate of CD frequency in the European population is still lacking. The aims of this study were: 1) to establish accurately the prevalence of CD in a large sample of the European population (Finland, Germany, Italy, and UK), including both children and adults; and 2) to investigate whether the prevalence of CD significantly varies between different areas of the European continent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples were drawn from the four populations. All 29,212 participants were tested for CD by tissue transglutaminase (tTG) antibody test. Positive and border-line findings were further tested for serum endomysial antibodies (EMA). All serological determinations were centrally performed. Small-bowel biopsies were recommended to autoantibody-positive individuals. Previously diagnosed cases were identified. RESULTS: The overall CD prevalence (previously diagnosed plus anti-tTG and EMA positives) was 1.0% (95% CI 0.9-1.1). In subjects aged 30-64 years CD prevalence was 2.4% in Finland (2.0-2.8), 0.3% in Germany (0.1-0.4), and 0.7% in Italy (0.4-1.0). Sixty-eight percent of antibody-positive individuals showed small-bowel mucosal changes typical for CD (Marsh II/III lesion). CONCLUSIONS: CD is common in Europe. CD prevalence shows large unexplained differences in adult age across different European countries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Singh, P., Arora, A., Strand, T. A., Leffler, D. A., Catassi, C., Green, P. H., Kelly, C. P., Ahuja, V., & Makharia, G. K. (2018) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037 · Cited by 1,743
Self-citationLudvigsson, J. F., Bai, J. C., Biagi, F., Card, T. R., Ciacci, C., Ciclitira, P. J., Green, P. H. R., Hadjivassiliou, M., Holdoway, A., van Heel, D. A., et al. (2014) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306578 · Cited by 1,116
Lebwohl, B., Sanders, D. S., & Green, P. H. R. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31796-8 · Cited by 1,065
Pennazio, M., Spada, C., Eliakim, R., Keuchel, M., May, A., Mulder, C., Rondonotti, E., Adler, S., Albert, J., Baltes, P., et al. (2015) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1391855 · Cited by 894
Fasano, A., & Catassi, C. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmcp1113994 · Cited by 687
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Mustalahti, K., Catassi, C., Reunanen, A., Fabiani, E., Heier, M., McMillan, S., Murray, L., Metzger, M.-H., Gasparin, M., Bravi, E., Mäki, M., & the members of the Coeliac EU Cluster, E.
- Venue
- Annals of Medicine
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2010-11-11
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 587-595
- ISSN
- 0785-3890 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2060
- OpenAlex
- W1980782171
- Cited by
- 765
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 36.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/07853890.2010.505931
- The paper
- Mustalahti, K., Catassi, C., Reunanen, A., Fabiani, E., Heier, M., McMillan, S., Murray, L., Metzger, M.-H., Gasparin, M., Bravi, E., Mäki, M., & the members of the Coeliac EU Cluster, E. (2010). The prevalence of celiac disease in Europe: Results of a centralized, international mass screening project. Annals of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.3109/07853890.2010.505931
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.