Cited by 174Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMotor Control and AdaptationIon Channels and Receptors

The Effects of Aging on Information-Processing Channels in the Sense of Touch: I. Absolute Sensitivity

Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J., Hall, K. L., Hoffman, K. E., Verrillo, R. T.·1994·Somatosensory & Motor Research

Abstract

Thresholds for detecting vibrotactile signals of variable frequency applied to the thenar eminence of the hand by small and large contactors were measured in subjects ranging in age from 10 to 89 years. Thresholds were found to increase as a function of age, but the rate of increase was greater after than before the age of 65 years. The rate of loss of vibrotactile sensitivity was substantially greater in the P channel (mediated by Pacinian corpuscles) than in the NP I channel (mediated by rapidly adapting fibers), the NP II channel (mediated by slowly adapting type II fibers), or the NP III channel (mediated by slowly adapting type I fibers). Women were frequently found to have greater sensitivity than men.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/08990229409028878

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tactile sensibility declines with age, as evidenced by increased sensory thresholds and decreased spatial acuity.

    “It has been widely demonstrated that tactile sensibility declines with age, as evidenced by increased sensory thresholds (Dyck et al. 1972;Gescheider et al. 1994;Thornbury and Mistretta 1981;Verrillo 1980) and decreased spatial acuity (Manning and Tremblay 2006;Stevens and Choo 1996;Stevens and Patterson 1995;Tremblay et al. 2003;Woodward 1993).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Gescheider et al. 1994

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gescheider, G. A., Bolanowski, S. J., Hall, K. L., Hoffman, K. E., & Verrillo, R. T.
Affiliations
  • Hamilton College (US)
  • Syracuse University (US)
Venue
Somatosensory & Motor Research
Published
1994-01
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
345-357
ISSN
  • 0899-0220 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1651
OpenAlex
W2068814897
Cited by
174
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Somatosensory & Motor Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01dc000098-21, 5r01dc001243-03)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC00098, R01 DC-01243)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
aging, vibrotactile sensitivity, tactile threshold, thenar eminence, Pacinian corpuscles, sex differences, age-related sensory decline
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Afferent Pathways, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Awareness, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Middle Aged, Psychophysics, Reference Values, Sensory Thresholds, Sex Factors, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review