Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 179

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of Visual Impairment in the Adult Japanese Population by Cause and Severity and Future Projections

Yamada, Masakazu, Hiratsuka, Yoshimune, Roberts, Chris B., Pezzullo, M. Lynne, Yates, Katie, Takano, Shigeru, Miyake, Kensaku, Taylor, Hugh R.·2010·Ophthalmic Epidemiology

Abstract

PURPOSE: To present a comprehensive estimate of the total number of people with visual impairment in the adult Japanese population by age, gender, severity and cause, and to estimate future prevalence based on population projections and expected demographic changes. METHODS: Definitions of visual impairment used in this study were based on the United States criteria. Total visual impairment was calculated as the sum of low vision and blindness. The prevalence estimates were based on input from a number of Japanese epidemiological surveys, census material and official population projections. RESULTS: There were an estimated 1.64 million people with visual impairment in 2007 in Japan. Of these, 187,800 were estimated to be blind. The prevalence of visual impairment in Japan increased with age and half of the people with visual impairment were aged 70 years or older. The leading causes of visual impairment in Japan were glaucoma (24.3%), diabetic retinopathy (20.6%), degenerative myopia (12.2%), age-related macular degeneration (10.9%), and cataract (7.2%). These five major causes comprised three-quarters of all visual impairment. The prevalence of visual impairment was projected to increase from 1.3% of the population in 2007 to 2.0% by 2050. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive study presents the prevalence of total visual impairment in the adult Japanese population. The projected increases in the prevalence of visual impairment over time reflect the demographic changes of a declining and aging Japanese population. These projections highlight that the burden of disease due to visual impairment and imposed on society is likely to increase.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09286580903450346

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 179

Metadata

Authors
Yamada, M., Hiratsuka, Y., Roberts, C. B., Pezzullo, M. L., Yates, K., Takano, S., Miyake, K., & Taylor, H. R.
Venue
Ophthalmic Epidemiology
Published
2010-01-25
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
50-57
ISSN
  • 0928-6586 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-5086
OpenAlex
W1966944283
Cited by
179
References
3
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Visual Impairment in the Adult Japanese Population by Cause and Severity and Future Projections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/09286580903450346
The paper
Yamada, M., Hiratsuka, Y., Roberts, C. B., Pezzullo, M. L., Yates, K., Takano, S., Miyake, K., & Taylor, H. R. (2010). Prevalence of Visual Impairment in the Adult Japanese Population by Cause and Severity and Future Projections. Ophthalmic Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.3109/09286580903450346

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.