CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHomicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psycho-social intervention following attempted suicide: is there a case for better services?

House, Allan, Owens, David, Storer, David·1992·International Review of Psychiatry
DOI 10.3109/09540269209066298
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Deliberate self-harm services in the UK are frequently unplanned and delivered without a coherent view of their function. This is unfortunate because the evidence is that—contrary to popular misconception—psychiatric intervention after parasuicide is worthwhile. To improve this state of affairs, interventions need to be aimed at groups of patients with clearly identified needs, using techniques of known effectiveness which are delivered by specific deliberate self-harm teams. Health service planners have a duty: to develop such services; to monitor the phenomenon of deliberate self-harm in their locality; and to ensure inter-district and inter-agency collaboration in the evaluation of those services.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09540269209066298

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Butterworth E., 1989, Health Trends, 21, 61
  2. Dennis M., 1990, Health Trends, 22, 125
  3. Kreitman N, 1980, The Suicide Syndrome
  4. Linter C. M, 1985, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychiatry, 3, 11
  5. Owens D, 1990, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 24, 281
  6. Owens D., 1991, Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 25, 218
  7. Stengel E., 1958, Attempted Suicide
  8. World Health Organization, 1985, Targets for Health for All

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
House, A., Owens, D., & Storer, D.
Affiliations
Leeds General Infirmary (GB)
ORCID
Venue
International Review of Psychiatry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1992-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
15-22
ISSN
  • 0954-0261 (ISSN-L)
  • 1369-1627
DOI
10.3109/09540269209066298
OpenAlex
W2072782137
Cited by
38
References
46
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
Keywords
self-harm, parasuicide, suicide attempts, psychosocial interventions, psychiatric intervention, health planning, inter-agency cooperation, service evaluation, health service monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review