Cited by 36Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHomelessness and Social Issues

Recovery, place and community mental health services

YATES, IAN, HOLMES, GUY, PRIEST, HELENA·2012·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While some studies have examined recovery in relation to specific contexts (e.g. housing and work), few have looked in detail at the social and environmental conditions in which recovery occurs. AIMS: To explore the relationship between the recovery of people receiving community mental health services and the places in which they live; to generate knowledge concerning aspects of locality which impact on recovery. METHOD: Grounded theory methodology was employed as a framework for collecting and analysing qualitative data. The study incorporated aspects of Photovoice ( Lopez et al., 2005 ) and ethnography. RESULTS: Four overlapping theoretical accounts are presented. These are: housing, space and agency; representations of social identity; natural environments; and replacement communities. CONCLUSIONS: Recovery can be understood as a variety of interacting ecological processes occurring in the context of the social, economic and physical environment. This offers new ways of thinking about recovery-orientated services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638237.2011.613957

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yates et al. (100) addressed this gap in recovery literature by studying in detail the social and environmental conditions in which recovery takes place, concluding recovery should be understood as an interaction of ecological processes such as the co-occurrence of personal growth and self-determination in contexts of social structures that restrict personal agency.

    “Yates et al. (100) addressed this gap in recovery literature by studying in detail the social and environmental conditions in which recovery takes place, concluding recovery should be understood as an interaction of ecological processes such as the co-occurrence of personal growth and self-determination in contexts of social structures that restrict personal agency.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
YATES, I., HOLMES, G., & PRIEST, H.
Affiliations
University of Staffordshire (GB)
Corresponding author
YATES, IAN
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2011-10-14
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
104-113
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W2002575225
Cited by
36
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Staffordshire Online Repository (Staffordshire University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Homelessness and Social Issues
Keywords
recovery, community mental health services, place, locality, housing, social identity, natural environment, ecosystem processes, social environment
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, United Kingdom, Housing, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Residence Characteristics, Social Environment, Social Identification, Social Support, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review