The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this research is to describe current practices in goal-setting within a subacute rehabilitation setting from the perspective of therapists representing the disciplines of occupational therapy, speech pathology and physiotherapy. METHOD: Qualitative semi-structured email interviews were conducted with therapists from the Geriatric Assessment and Rehabilitation Unit of an Australian hospital. Therapists were required to respond to questioning with reference to identified rehabilitation patients with stroke. RESULTS: Three approaches to goal-setting were identified: therapist controlled, therapist led and patient centred. Goals aimed at the ICF levels of impairment and activity limitations were predominant. Barriers to a patient centered goal-setting approach largely outweighed facilitators. Potential successful resolutions were offered to overcome these barriers. CONCLUSIONS: The inability of patients to participate fully in the goal-setting process largely determines the approach taken by therapists. This influences the level of patient centeredness incorporated into the goal-setting process. Goals expressed at the level of impairment, by therapists, may be stepping stones to perceived patient goals at the levels of activity and participation. Barriers to a patient centered approach can be overcome through education of the patient and family regarding the nature of the injury and modification of communication between therapist and patient.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 2×
“Patient centeredness has not only become an important underlying principle for the delivery of health and rehabilitation services [3,12], it has also become an important aspect of the goal-setting process [17].”
Background
Cited by
What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF
Worrall, L., Sherratt, S., Rogers, P., Howe, T., Hersh, D., Ferguson, A., & Davidson, B. (2011) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.508530 · Cited by 443
The effects and experiences of goal setting in stroke rehabilitation – a systematic review
Sugavanam, T., Mead, G., Bulley, C., Donaghy, M., & van Wijck, F. (2013) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.690501 · Cited by 226
Plant, S. E., Tyson, S. F., Kirk, S., & Parsons, J. (2016) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/0269215516655856 · Cited by 202
Krasny-Pacini, A., Evans, J., Sohlberg, M. M., & Chevignard, M. (2016) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2015.08.424 · Cited by 151
Enhancing patient-provider communication for long-term post-stroke spasticity management
Sunnerhagen, K. S., & Francisco, G. E. (2013) · Acta Neurologica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/ane.12128 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Leach, E., Cornwell, P., Fleming, J., & Haines, T.
- Venue
- Disability and Rehabilitation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-12-02
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-172
- ISSN
- 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-5165
- OpenAlex
- W2015497224
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.