Cited by 42Cerebral Palsy and Movement DisordersBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological DisordersStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Effects of functional electrical stimulation on trunk control in children with diplegic cerebral palsy

Karabay, İlkay, Dogan, Asuman, Arslan, Meryem Doğan, Dost, Gülseren, Ozgirgin, Nese·2012·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the efficiency of FES application on the abdomen-posterior back muscles in children with CP that were enrolled into physical therapy and rehabilitation (PTR) program. METHOD: The study included 55 spastic diplegic children that were hospitalized for rehabilitation. Those with deformities that could disrupt the balance in sitting and cause problems in evaluations were excluded. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups according to their time of presentation. Thirty-two children completed the study. The control group received PTR program only for 4 weeks. The children in the FES group received PTR in addition to electrical stimulation. Electrical stimulation was applied 5 days a week for 4 weeks to abdomen-posterior back muscles in 30-minute-long sessions. To evaluate the balance in sitting, sitting score of gross motor function measurement (GMFM) and to evaluate the trunk asymmetry in sitting, radiographic measurements were used. Thus, kyphosis, Cobb and sacral angles were measured. RESULTS: The comparisons of the measurements of the two groups before and after the treatment showed that the GMFM sitting score and the sacral angle were statistically significantly increased, and the kyphotic and Cobb angles were statistically significantly decreased. After the treatment, both groups demonstrated an increase in the GMFM score, but the increase in the FES group was statistically significantly higher than that in the control group. With respect to radiological measurements, the changes observed in both the kyphotic and Cobb angles after the treatment were statistically significantly higher in the FES group than in the control group. The rates of the changes in the sacral angle did not differ among the groups. CONCLUSION: We believe to provide balance in sitting for children with CP, FES applied on abdomen-back muscles along with conventional therapy to maintain trunk control is more effective than conventional therapy alone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2011.628741

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • No discomfort was reported by children receiving FES.

    “No discomfort was reported by children receiving FES (see Table SIV). 42”
  • Two studies, both evidence level II, applied FES to abdominal and lumbar muscles simultaneously with the aim of improving muscle strength and function.

    “Two studies, 41,42 both evidence level II (Table I), applied FES to abdominal and lumbar muscles simultaneously, with the aim of improving muscle strength and function.”
  • FES, along with rehabilitation, improved postural alignment (BF&S) to a greater extent than rehabilitation alone (evidence level II, conduct weak).

    “FES, along with rehabilitation, improved postural alignment (BF&S) to a greater extent than rehabilitation alone (evidence level II, conduct weak; see Table SIIIa). 41,42”
  • An unspecified dose of NDT alone or NDT combined with conventional rehabilitation treatments improved postural alignment over 6 weeks in children with spastic diplegia, aged between 8 months and 10 years.

    “An unspecified dose of NDT alone, 41 or NDT ('based on the Bobath technique') combined with 'conventional rehabilitation' treatments (i.e. joint mobility, muscle strengthening, and mobility activities), 42 improved postural alignment (BF&S, two of level II, conduct weak; see Table SIIIa) over 6 weeks in children with spastic diplegia, aged between 8 months and 10 years. 41,42”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Karabay, İ., Dogan, A., Arslan, M. D., Dost, G., & Ozgirgin, N.
Affiliations
Ankara Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Karabay, İlkay
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2011-12-09
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
965-970
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2082410164
Cited by
42
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
functional electrical stimulation, spastic diplegia, trunk control, trunk asymmetry, sitting balance, spasticity, abdominal muscles, kyphosis, Cobb angle, Gross Motor Function Measure, physical therapy and rehabilitation, children
MeSH terms
Abdominal Muscles, Cerebral Palsy, Child, Child, Preschool, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Posture, Treatment Outcome, Gait Disorders, Neurologic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review