Cited by 54Interprofessional Education and CollaborationInterdisciplinary Research and CollaborationMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

Interprofessional collaboration: development of a tool to enhance knowledge translation

Careau, Emmanuelle, Brière, Nathalie, Houle, Nathalie, Dumont, Serge, Vincent, Claude, Swaine, Bonnie·2015·Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interprofessional collaboration (IPC) is a complex and multidimensional process in which different professionals work together to positively impact health care. In order to enhance the knowledge translation and improve rehabilitation practitioners' knowledge and skills toward IPC, it is essential to develop a comprehensive tool that illustrates how IPC should be operationalized in clinical settings. Thus, this study aims at developing, validating and assessing the usefulness of a comprehensive framework illustrating how the interactional factors should be operationalized in clinical settings to promote good collaboration. METHODS: This article presents a mixed-method approach used to involve rehabilitation stakeholders (n = 20) in the development and validation of an IPC framework according to a systematic seven-phase procedure. RESULTS: The final framework shows five types of practices according to four components: the situation of the client and family, the intention underlying the collaboration, the interaction between practitioners, and the combining of disciplinary knowledge. CONCLUSION: The framework integrates the current scientific knowledge and clinical experience regarding the conceptualization of IPC. It is considered as a relevant and useful KT tool to enhance IPC knowledge for various stakeholders, especially in the rehabilitation field. This comprehensive and contextualized framework could be used in undergraduate and continuing education initiatives. Implications for Rehabilitation The framework developed integrates the current scientific knowledge and clinical experience regarding the conceptualization of interprofessional collaboration (IPC) that is relevant to the rehabilitation field. It could be used in undergraduate and continuing education initiatives to help learners understand the multidimensional and dynamic nature of IPC. It could be useful to support practitioners and managers from the rehabilitation field in their efforts to optimize collaborative practice within their organization.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/09638288.2014.918193

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Careau, E., Brière, N., Houle, N., Dumont, S., Vincent, C., & Swaine, B.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Centre de Santé et de Services Sociaux de la Vieille-Capitale (CA)
  • Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CA)
Corresponding author
Careau, Emmanuelle
Venue
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2014-05-14
Volume
37
Issue
4
Pages
372-378
ISSN
  • 0963-8288 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-5165
OpenAlex
W2092339611
Cited by
54
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Disability and Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
interprofessional collaboration, knowledge translation, rehabilitation professionals, interactional factors, interdisciplinary knowledge integration, rehabilitation education, continuing professional development, collaborative practice
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Interprofessional Relations, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Translational Research, Biomedical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review