Cited by 46Digital Mental Health InterventionsImpact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health Treatment and Access

Reaching the Hard-To-Reach: How Information Communication Technologies Can Reach Young People at Greater Risk of Mental Health Difficulties

Stephens-Reicher, Justine, Metcalf, Atari, Blanchard, Michelle, Mangan, Cheryl, Burns, Jane·2011·Australasian Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Inspire and partners have built an evidence base examining the role technology can play in supporting the mental health and wellbeing of young people at increased risk of developing mental health difficulties. This paper explores these findings collectively and considers how to best use information communication technologies (ICT) to meet the mental health needs of diverse young people aged 14–25. Conclusions: ICT offers relevant and innovative strategies for young people at increased risk of developing mental health difficulties. Whilst many young people experience social isolation and stigma, the manifestation of these issues and the strategies required to address them vary. ICT-based programs will benefit from identifying which protective factors can be most positively influenced through the unique properties of ICT, amongst whom and how. Challenges to ICT-based health services include inadequate access and training, lower literacy levels and the need for specialized technologies for people with disabilities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10398562.2011.583077

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Internet services have several advantages: no geographical boundaries, generally free to the user, and largely anonymous and private, which is likely to reduce stigma and embarrassment associated with seeking help.

    “Internet services have several advantages: no geographical boundaries, services are generally free to the user, and the Internet is largely anonymous and private, which is likely to reduce the stigma and embarrassment associated with seeking help [22].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stephens-Reicher, J., Metcalf, A., Blanchard, M., Mangan, C., & Burns, J.
Affiliations
  • Inspire Foundation, Rozelle, NSW, Australia,  justine@inspire.org.au
  • Inspire Foundation, Rozelle, NSW, Australia
  • Cooperative Research Centre for Young People, Technology and Wellbeing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Australasian Psychiatry
Published
2011-07
Volume
19
Issue
1_suppl
Pages
S58-S61
ISSN
  • 1039-8562 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1665
OpenAlex
W2104483113
Cited by
46
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australasian Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Inspire Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
information and communication technologies, digital mental health interventions, social isolation, mental health stigma, protective factors, digital divide, digital literacy, people with disabilities
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Computer Communication Networks, Health Promotion, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Mental Health Services, Program Development, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review