Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Assessment of the Toxicological Properties of Pyrethroids and Their Neurotoxicity

Aldridge, W. N.·1990·Critical Reviews in Toxicology

Abstract

1. Most pyrethroids can be divided into two classes on the basis of differences in the signs of toxicity (T- orCS-syndromes). Since these syndromes also correspond to particular aspects of their chemical structure and since the order of appearance of the signs of poisoning is the same in each class, it is concluded that these syndromes originate from a single primary action of the pyrethroid.2. Pyrethroids cause morphological changes in peripheral nerves of rats when given in high doses. The production of these minor lesions are correlated with a dose of the pyrethroid that causes death in some of the treated rats. Lower doses do not cause these effects. Therefore, the morphological changes are produced as a secondary consequence of the primary action of pyrethroids and are not due to a different form of toxicity.3. Pyrethroids have been shown to cause functional changes (behavioral) in rats shown as a deficit in performance on an inclined plane. Increases in peripheral nerves of β-glucuronidase and β-galactosidase have also been demonstrated. These increases are a late finding and are considered to be associated with repair processes. As with the morphological changes these enzyme changes are correlated with doses that cause death in some of the animals. There is no firm evidence that the behavioral changes are correlated with either the morphological or biochemcial changes.4. Available information indicates that all the above changes described in 2 and 3 are reversible or repairable.5. Many pyrethroids cause an effect in humans termed parasthesia. It seems probable from structure-activity relationships that parathesia, as for their systemic toxicity, is brought about by an action of pyrethroids on sodium channels of the sensory nerves.6. Studies have been carried out on human volunteers and a guinea pig model has been developed. Subjective human experience and some experimental work indicates that the effects are reversible and result in no permanent change.7. There is no conclusive evidence that pyrethroids have neurotoxic actions other than those originating from their primary action on sodium channels, through a dissociable interaction with macromolecular component(s).8. Further research is recommended to extend knowledge of pyrethroids as a class rather than for individual compounds.9. All available evidence indicates that, at doses of pyrethroids likely to be encountered in working practice, when serious poisoning does not occur, neurotoxicity due to the pyrethroids will not occur except as a reversible transient effect on the skin. This minor warning response is due to the primary action of pyrethroids on sodium channels, a reversible interaction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10408449009089874

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Aldridge, W. N.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Toxicology
Published
1990-01
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
89-104
ISSN
  • 0045-6446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1040-8444
  • 1547-6898
OpenAlex
W2099022120
Cited by
180
References
0
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Assessment of the Toxicological Properties of Pyrethroids and Their Neurotoxicity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10408449009089874
The paper
Aldridge, W. N. (1990). An Assessment of the Toxicological Properties of Pyrethroids and Their Neurotoxicity. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408449009089874

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.