Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 292

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Organization of Extracellularly Mineralized Tissues: A Comparative Study of Biological Crystal Growt

Weiner, Stephen, Lowenstam, Ha·1986·Critical Reviews in Biochemistry

Abstract

Biological mineralization processes are extremely diverse and, to date, it is an act of faith rather than an established principle that organisms utilize common mechanisms for forming crystals. A systematic analysis of the structural organization, as far as possible at the molecular level, of five different extracellularly mineralized tissues is presented to demonstrate that at least these mineralization processes are all part of the same continuum. The degrees of control exercised over crystal nucleation and crystal growth modulation are the basic variables. The five tissues, extracellularly mineralizing algae, radial and granular foraminifera, mammalian bone, mammalian enamel, and mollusk shell nacre, probably span the entire spectrum. Their crystal shapes, sizes, and the relations between the mineral phase and the organic phase, are primarily used to assess probable degrees of control exercised over crystal nucleation and modulation. Three different types of nucleation processes can be recognized: nonspecific, stereochemical, and epitaxial. Modulation of crystal growth after nucleation is either absent, achieved by adsorption of macromolecules onto specific crystal faces, or occurs by the prepositioning of matrix surfaces which interrupt crystal growth. The tissues in which active control is exercised over crystal growth all contain similar types of acidic matrix macromolecules. Significantly, the framework matrix macromolecules are all quite different and hence probably perform some tissue-specific functions. The study shows that there is a common basis for understanding these mineralization processes which is reflected in the nature of the protein-crystal interactions which occur in each tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10409238609081998

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 292

Metadata

Authors
Weiner, S., & Lowenstam, H.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Biochemistry
Published
1986-01
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
365-408
ISSN
  • 0045-6411 (ISSN-L)
  • 1040-8355
OpenAlex
W2106428012
Cited by
292
References
2
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organization of Extracellularly Mineralized Tissues: A Comparative Study of Biological Crystal Growt. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10409238609081998
The paper
Weiner, S., & Lowenstam, H. (1986). Organization of Extracellularly Mineralized Tissues: A Comparative Study of Biological Crystal Growt. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409238609081998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.