The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Glut athione S-Transferase Supergene Family: Regulation of GST and the Contribution of the lsoenzymes to Cancer Chemoprotection and Drug Resistance Part I
Abstract
The glutathione S-transferases (GST) represent a major group of detoxification enzymes. All eukaryotic species possess multiple cytosolic and membrane-bound GST isoenzymes, each of which displays distinct catalytic as well as noncatalytic binding properties: the cytosolic enzymes are encoded by at least five distantly related gene families (designated class alpha, mu, pi, sigma, and theta GST), whereas the membrane-bound enzymes, microsomal GST and leukotriene C4 synthetase, are encoded by single genes and both have arisen separately from the soluble GST. Evidence suggests that the level of expression of GST is a crucial factor in determining the sensitivity of cells to a broad spectrum of toxic chemicals. In this article the biochemical functions of GST are described to show how individual isoenzymes contribute to resistance to carcinogens, antitumor drugs, environmental pollutants, and products of oxidative stress. A description of the mechanisms of transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation of GST isoenzymes is provided to allow identification of factors that may modulate resistance to specific noxious chemicals. The most abundant mammalian GST are the class alpha, mu, and pi enzymes and their regulation has been studied in detail. The biological control of these families is complex as they exhibit sex-, age-, tissue-, species-, and tumor-specific patterns of expression. In addition, GST are regulated by a structurally diverse range of xenobiotics and, to date, at least 100 chemicals have been identified that induce GST; a significant number of these chemical inducers occur naturally and, as they are found as nonnutrient components in vegetables and citrus fruits, it is apparent that humans are likely to be exposed regularly to such compounds. Many inducers, but not all, effect transcriptional activation of GST genes through either the antioxidant-responsive element (ARE), the xenobiotic-responsive element (XRE), the GST P enhancer 1(GPE), or the glucocorticoid-responsive element (GRE). Barbiturates may transcriptionally activate GST through a Barbie box element. The involvement of the Ah-receptor, Maf, Nrl, Jun, Fos, and NF-kappa B in GST induction is discussed. Many of the compounds that induce GST are themselves substrates for these enzymes, or are metabolized (by cytochrome P-450 monooxygenases) to compounds that can serve as GST substrates, suggesting that GST induction represents part of an adaptive response mechanism to chemical stress caused by electrophiles. It also appears probable that GST are regulated in vivo by reactive oxygen species (ROS), because not only are some of the most potent inducers capable of generating free radicals by redox-cycling, but H2O2 has been shown to induce GST in plant and mammalian cells: induction of GST by ROS would appear to represent an adaptive response as these enzymes detoxify some of the toxic carbonyl-, peroxide-, and epoxide-containing metabolites produced within the cell by oxidative stress. Class alpha, mu, and pi GST isoenzymes are overexpressed in rat hepatic preneoplastic nodules and the increased levels of these enzymes are believed to contribute to the multidrug-resistant phenotype observed in these lesions. The majority of human tumors and human tumor cell lines express significant amounts of class pi GST. Cell lines selected in vitro for resistance to anticancer drugs frequently overexpress class pi GST, although overexpression of class alpha and mu isoenzymes is also often observed. The mechanisms responsible for overexpression of GST include transcriptional activation, stabilization of either mRNA or protein, and gene amplification. In humans, marked interindividual differences exist in the expression of class alpha, mu, and theta GST. The molecular basis for the variation in class alpha GST is not known. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rosen, D. R., Siddique, T., Patterson, D., Figlewicz, D. A., Sapp, P., Hentati, A., Donaldson, D., Goto, J., O'Regan, J. P., Deng, H.-X., et al. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/362059a0 · Cited by 7,062
Overexpression of a Transporter Gene in a Multidrug-Resistant Human Lung Cancer Cell Line
Cole, S. P. C., Bhardwaj, G., Gerlach, J. H., Mackie, J. E., Grant, C. E., Almquist, K. C., Stewart, A. J., Kurz, E. U., Duncan, A. M. V., & Deeley, R. G. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1360704 · Cited by 3,037
[51] Assays for differentiation of glutathione S-Transferases
Habig, W. H., & Jakoby, W. B. (1981) · Methods in Enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(81)77053-8 · Cited by 2,419
Redox Regulation of Fos and Jun DNA-Binding Activity in Vitro
Abate, C., Patel, L., Rauscher, F. J., & Curran, T. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2118682 · Cited by 1,573
In vitro analysis of Ah receptor domains involved in ligand-activated DNA recognition.
Dolwick, K. M., Swanson, H. I., & Bradfield, C. A. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.18.8566 · Cited by 239
Thier, R., Muller, M., Taylor, J. B., Pemble, S. E., Ketterer, B., & Guengerich, F. P. (1995) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx00045a019 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer
Valko, M., Rhodes, C. J., Moncol, J., Izakovic, M., & Mazur, M. (2006) · Chemico-Biological Interactions · doi:10.1016/j.cbi.2005.12.009 · Cited by 6,680
Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense
Birben, E., Sahiner, U. M., Sackesen, C., Erzurum, S., & Kalayci, O. (2012) · World Allergy Organization Journal · doi:10.1097/wox.0b013e3182439613 · Cited by 4,935
Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review
van der Oost, R., Beyer, J., & Vermeulen, N. P. E. (2003) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s1382-6689(02)00126-6 · Cited by 4,895
Itoh, K., Wakabayashi, N., Katoh, Y., Ishii, T., Igarashi, K., Engel, J. D., & Yamamoto, M. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.1.76 · Cited by 3,634
SHEEHAN, D., MEADE, G., FOLEY, V. M., & DOWD, C. A. (2001) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/0264-6021:3600001 · Cited by 3,057
Metadata
- Authors
- Hayes, J. D., & Pulford, D. J.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 445-520
- ISSN
- 0045-6411 (ISSN-L)
- 1040-9238
- 1549-7798
- OpenAlex
- W2046750894
- Cited by
- 3,464
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Glut athione S-Transferase Supergene Family: Regulation of GST and the Contribution of the lsoenzymes to Cancer Chemoprotection and Drug Resistance Part I. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10409239509083491
- The paper
- Hayes, J. D., & Pulford, D. J. (1995). The Glut athione S-Transferase Supergene Family: Regulation of GST and the Contribution of the lsoenzymes to Cancer Chemoprotection and Drug Resistance Part I. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.3109/10409239509083491
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.