Cited by 17Ethics in Clinical ResearchBiomedical Ethics and RegulationPharmaceutical industry and healthcare

The opportunities and challenges in conducting clinical trials globally

Bansal, Navneeta·2012·Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs

Abstract

Clinical trials using human subjects are an integral part of the approval of new drugs and biologics. According to Center Watch, 86% of US clinical studies fail to recruit the required number of subjects on time. It is therefore logical that pharmaceutical companies would turn to global outsourcing. Many of these trials are being conducted in developing countries. Accrual in developing countries can be 5–10-times quicker than in the US or Europe. However, clinical trials conducted in other countries differ in many respects. Thus, conducting clinical trials globally raises the concerns of regulatory authorities regarding the transparency, quality, accuracy, and carrying out of these trials following ethical norms. Although clinical research abroad is greatly facilitated by recent efforts to standardize regulatory procedures, and using new technologies has helped to standardize multinational data collection, the issues associated with the globalization of clinical trials still raises concerns about the ethics, adequacy of regulatory supervision of clinical trial, and accuracy and validity of results. This paper examines the impact of the trend being followed globally and presents an analysis of potential ways to capitalize on the associated opportunities while mitigating the challenges in conducting clinical trials globally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10601333.2011.647034

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bansal, N.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Bansal, Navneeta
Venue
Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs
Published
2012-02-09
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
9-14
ISSN
  • 1060-1333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2521
OpenAlex
W2023470500
Cited by
17
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Clinical Research and Regulatory Affairs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
Keywords
global clinical trials, clinical trial outsourcing, developing countries, clinical trial recruitment, regulatory oversight, clinical trial ethics, regulatory standardization, pharmaceutical industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review