The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction of Poly(butylcyanoacrylate) Nanoparticles with the Blood-Brain Barrier in vivo and in vitro
Abstract
Poly(butylcyanoacrylate) nanoparticles were produced by emulsion polymerisation and used either uncoated or overcoated with polysorbate 80 (Tween 80). [3H]-dalargin bound to nanoparticles overcoated with polysorbate 80 or in the form of saline solution was injected into mice and the brain concentrations of radioactivity determined. Statistically significant, three-fold higher brain concentrations with the nanoparticle preparations were obtained after 45 minutes, the time of greatest pharmacological response assessed as analgesia in previous experiments. In addition the brain inulin spaces in rats and the uptake of fluoresceine isothiocyanate labelled nanoparticles in immortalised rat cerebral endothelial cells, (RBE4) were measured. The inulin spaces after i.v. injection of polysorbate 80-coated nanoparticles were significantly increased by 1% compared to controls. This is interpreted as indicating that there is no large scale opening of the tight junctions of the brain endothelium by the polysorbate 80-coated nanoparticles. In in vitro experiments endocytic uptake of fluorescent nanoparticles by RBE4 cells was only observed after polysorbate 80-overcoating, not with uncoated particles. These results further support the hypothesis that the mechanism of blood-brain barrier transport of drugs by polysorbate 80-coated nanoparticles is one of endocytosis followed by possible transcytosis. The experiments were conducted in several laboratories as part of an EEC/INTAS collaborative program. For various procedural and regulatory reasons this necessitated the use of both rats and mice as experimental animals. The brain endothelial cell line used for the in vitro studies is the rat RBE4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Electrical resistance of brain microvascular endothelium
Crone, C., & Olesen, S. P. (1982) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(82)91227-6 · Cited by 491
Olivier, J.-C., Fenart, L., Chauvet, R., Pariat, C., Cecchelli, R., & Couet, W. (1999) · Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.1023/a:1018947208597 · Cited by 213
Cited by
Determining the Size and Shape Dependence of Gold Nanoparticle Uptake into Mammalian Cells
Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A., & Chan, W. C. W. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl052396o · Cited by 4,879
Nanoparticles – known and unknown health risks
Hoet, P. H., Brüske-Hohlfeld, I., & Salata, O. V. (2004) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/1477-3155-2-12 · Cited by 1,374
Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs.
Kreuter, J. (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(00)00122-8 · Cited by 1,107
Nanoparticulate systems for brain delivery of drugs
Kreuter, J. (2012) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.015 · Cited by 958
Self-citationTransport of drugs across the blood–brain barrier by nanoparticles.
Wohlfart, S., Gelperina, S., & Kreuter, J. (2012) · Journal of Controlled Release · doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.08.017 · Cited by 715
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alyaudtin, R. N., Reichel, A., Löbenberg, R., Ramge, P., Kreuter, J., & Begley, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Drug Targeting
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-221
- ISSN
- 1026-7158 (ISSN-L)
- 1061-186X
- 1029-2330
- OpenAlex
- W2072205289
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of Poly(butylcyanoacrylate) Nanoparticles with the Blood-Brain Barrier in vivo and in vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10611860108997929
- The paper
- Alyaudtin, R. N., Reichel, A., Löbenberg, R., Ramge, P., Kreuter, J., & Begley, D. J. (2001). Interaction of Poly(butylcyanoacrylate) Nanoparticles with the Blood-Brain Barrier in vivo and in vitro. Journal of Drug Targeting. https://doi.org/10.3109/10611860108997929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.