Quality of life: The ultimate outcome measure of interventions in major depressive disorder
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Quality-of-life (QOL) assessment and improvement have recently been recognized as important components of health care, in general, and mental health care, in particular. Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have a significantly diminished QOL. METHODS: Using a Medline search of relevant keywords for the past 26 years, this article reviews the empirical literature to provide information regarding QOL measurement, impairment, impact of comorbidity, and treatment effects in MDD. RESULTS: Studies showed that QOL is greatly affected by depression. Severity of depression is also a major contributor to further reduction in QOL when depression is comorbid with other psychiatric and medical disorders. Treatment for MDD has been shown to improve QOL in the acute treatment phase, but QOL remains low compared to healthy controls even when symptoms are in remission following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MDD suffer from poor QOL even after reduction of symptom severity. Clinicians should therefore include QOL assessment as an important part of treating depression. More research is needed to examine the factors contributing to poor QOL in MDD and to develop interventions to ameliorate it. Additionally, future treatment studies of MDD with or without comorbid disorders should track QOL as the ultimate outcome measure of treatment success.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Improved quality of life is considered an important outcome in the treatment of MDD.
“Knowing which symptoms may prevent patients from reporting a good quality of life, and that it may be patients' poor perceptions of their quality of life that may lead them to report less PA and more NA, is essential because improved quality of life is considered an important outcome in the treatment of MDD (IsHak et al., 2011).”
From Mood Disorders in Everyday Life: A Systematic Review of Experience Sampling and Ecological Momentary Assessment Studies (2012) · cites this paper as IsHak et al., 2011
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 313
- Authors
- IsHak, W. W., Greenberg, J. M., Balayan, K., Kapitanski, N., Jeffrey, J., Fathy, H., Fakhry, H., & Rapaport, M. H.
- Affiliations
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- IsHak, Waguih William
- Venue
- Harvard Review of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2011-09-20
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 229-239
- ISSN
- 1067-3229 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972905657
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Harvard Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- quality of life, major depressive disorder, outcome measures, comorbidities, depression severity, remission, treatment effects, mental health services, quality of life assessment
- MeSH terms
- Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review