Cited by 313Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Quality of life: The ultimate outcome measure of interventions in major depressive disorder

IsHak, Waguih William, Greenberg, Jared Matt, Balayan, Konstantin, Kapitanski, Nina, Jeffrey, Jessica, Fathy, Hassan, Fakhry, Hala, Rapaport, Mark Hyman·2011·Harvard Review of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Quality-of-life (QOL) assessment and improvement have recently been recognized as important components of health care, in general, and mental health care, in particular. Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) have a significantly diminished QOL. METHODS: Using a Medline search of relevant keywords for the past 26 years, this article reviews the empirical literature to provide information regarding QOL measurement, impairment, impact of comorbidity, and treatment effects in MDD. RESULTS: Studies showed that QOL is greatly affected by depression. Severity of depression is also a major contributor to further reduction in QOL when depression is comorbid with other psychiatric and medical disorders. Treatment for MDD has been shown to improve QOL in the acute treatment phase, but QOL remains low compared to healthy controls even when symptoms are in remission following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MDD suffer from poor QOL even after reduction of symptom severity. Clinicians should therefore include QOL assessment as an important part of treating depression. More research is needed to examine the factors contributing to poor QOL in MDD and to develop interventions to ameliorate it. Additionally, future treatment studies of MDD with or without comorbid disorders should track QOL as the ultimate outcome measure of treatment success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10673229.2011.614099

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Improved quality of life is considered an important outcome in the treatment of MDD.

    “Knowing which symptoms may prevent patients from reporting a good quality of life, and that it may be patients' poor perceptions of their quality of life that may lead them to report less PA and more NA, is essential because improved quality of life is considered an important outcome in the treatment of MDD (IsHak et al., 2011).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 78 · Cited by 313

Authors
IsHak, W. W., Greenberg, J. M., Balayan, K., Kapitanski, N., Jeffrey, J., Fathy, H., Fakhry, H., & Rapaport, M. H.
Affiliations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
IsHak, Waguih William
Venue
Harvard Review of Psychiatry
Published
2011-09-20
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
229-239
ISSN
1067-3229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972905657
Cited by
313
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Harvard Review of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
quality of life, major depressive disorder, outcome measures, comorbidities, depression severity, remission, treatment effects, mental health services, quality of life assessment
MeSH terms
Major Depressive Disorder, Depressive Disorder, Major, Humans, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review