The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the Antioxidant Actions of Ferulic Acid and Catechins
Abstract
We have evaluated the abilities of ferulic acid, (+/-) catechin, (+) catechin and (-) epicatechin to scavenge the reactive oxygen species hydroxyl radical (OH.), hypochlorous acid (HOCl) and peroxyl radicals (RO2.). Ferulic acid tested at concentrations up to 5 mM inhibited the peroxidation of phospholipid liposomes. Both (+/-) and (+) catechin and (-) epicatechin were much more effective. All the compounds tested reacted with trichloromethyl peroxyl radical (CCl3 O2.) with rate constants > 1 x 10(6) M-1 s-1. A mixture of FeCl3-EDTA, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and ascorbic acid at pH 7.4, has often been used to generate hydroxyl radicals (OH.) which are detected by their ability to cause damage to the sugar deoxyribose. Ferulic acid, (+) and (+/-) catechin and (-) epicatechin inhibited deoxyribose damage by reacting with OH. with rate constants of 4.5 x 10(9)M-1 s-1, 3.65 x 10(9) M-1 s-1, 2.36 x 10(9) M-1 s-1 and 2.84 x 10(9) M-1 s-1 respectively. (-) Epicatechin, ferulic acid and the (+) and (+/-) catechins exerted pro-oxidant action, accelerating damage to DNA in the presence of a bleomycin-iron complex. On a molar basis, ferulic acid was less effective in causing damage to DNA compared with the catechins. A mixture of hypoxanthine and xanthine oxidase generates O2-. which reduces cytochrome c to ferrocytochrome c. (+) Catechin and (-) epicatechin inhibited the reduction of cytochrome c in a concentration dependent manner. Ferulic acid and (+/-) catechin had only weak effects. All the compounds tested were able to scavenge hypochlorous acid at a rate sufficient to protect alpha-1-antiproteinase against inactivation. Our results show that catechins and ferulic acid possess antioxidant properties. This may become important given the current search for "natural" replacements for synthetic antioxidant food additives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tissue Destruction by Neutrophils
Epstein, F. H., & Weiss, S. J. (1989) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198902093200606 · Cited by 3,950
Cited by
Total Antioxidant Capacity of Teas by the Ferric Reducing/Antioxidant Power Assay
Benzie, I. F. F., & Szeto, Y. T. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf9807768 · Cited by 756
Yilmaz, Y., & Toledo, R. T. (2004) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf030117h · Cited by 734
Antimicrobial properties of green tea catechins
Taylor, P. W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., & Stapleton, P. D. (2005) · Food Science <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Technology Bulletin: Functional Foods · doi:10.1616/1476-2137.14184 · Cited by 373
Protective effects of tea polyphenols against oxidative damage to red blood cells
Grinberg, L. N., Newmark, H., Kitrossky, N., Rahamim, E., Chevion, M., & Rachmilewitz, E. A. (1997) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0006-2952(97)00155-x · Cited by 187
Rahim, N. S., Lim, S. M., Mani, V., Hazalin, N. A. M. N., Majeed, A. B. A., & Ramasamy, K. (2021) · Journal of Dietary Supplements · doi:10.1080/19390211.2020.1830223 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott, B. C., Butler, J., Halliwell, B., & Aruoma, O. I.
- Venue
- Free Radical Research Communications
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1993-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 241-253
- ISSN
- 8755-0199 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2106498051
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the Antioxidant Actions of Ferulic Acid and Catechins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10715769309056512
- The paper
- Scott, B. C., Butler, J., Halliwell, B., & Aruoma, O. I. (1993). Evaluation of the Antioxidant Actions of Ferulic Acid and Catechins. Free Radical Research Communications. https://doi.org/10.3109/10715769309056512
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.