The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Moral Economies of Homeless Heroin Addicts: Confronting Ethnography, HIV Risk, and Everyday Violence in San Francisco Shooting Encampments
Abstract
Ethnographic immersion among homeless heroin addicts in San Francisco documents far more risky practices than the public health literature routinely reports. The logics of street-based income-generating strategies and the moral economy of social networking among self-identified "dope fiends" results in almost daily shares of drug preparation paraphernalia. Public health researchers need to reconceptualize their psychological behaviorist paradigm of "individual health risk behavior" because the pragmatics of income-generating strategies and the social symbolic hierarchies of respect, identity, and mutual dependence shape risky behavior. The explanatory potentials and the applied interventions that participant-observation anthropological approaches could bring to epidemiological public health research have not been utilized effectively in the field of HIV prevention and substance use. The accuracy of quantitative public health databases and our understanding of the who/why/how/where of HIV infection could be improved by a cross-methodological dialogue with participant-observation fieldworkers and by a greater theoretical sophistication with respect to power, violence, and extreme social marginalization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The ‘risk environment’: A framework for understanding and reducing drug-related harm
Rhodes, T. (2002) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/s0955-3959(02)00007-5 · Cited by 1,241
Risk environments and drug harms: a social science for harm reduction approach
Rhodes, T. (2009) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2008.10.003 · Cited by 948
The social structural production of HIV risk among injecting drug users
Rhodes, T., Singer, M., Bourgois, P., Friedman, S. R., & Strathdee, S. A. (2005) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.12.024 · Cited by 934
Self-citationMethods in the Time of COVID-19: The Vital Role of Qualitative Inquiries
Teti, M., Schatz, E., & Liebenberg, L. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920920962 · Cited by 341
The Everyday Violence of Hepatitis C among Young Women Who Inject Drugs in San Francisco
Bourgois, P., Prince, B., & Moss, A. (2004) · Human Organization · doi:10.17730/humo.63.3.h1phxbhrb7m4mlv0 · Cited by 318
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bourgois, P.
- Venue
- Substance Use & Misuse
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-01
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2323-2351
- ISSN
- 1082-6084 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-2491
- OpenAlex
- W2119070466
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Moral Economies of Homeless Heroin Addicts: Confronting Ethnography, HIV Risk, and Everyday Violence in San Francisco Shooting Encampments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/10826089809056260
- The paper
- Bourgois, P. (1998). The Moral Economies of Homeless Heroin Addicts: Confronting Ethnography, HIV Risk, and Everyday Violence in San Francisco Shooting Encampments. Substance Use & Misuse. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089809056260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.