The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vaginal Health: Insights, Views & Attitudes (VIVA) – results from an international survey
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess knowledge of vaginal atrophy among women using the Vaginal Health: Insights, Views & Attitudes (VIVA) survey. METHODS: A structured online questionnaire was used to obtain information from 3520 postmenopausal women aged 55-65 years living in Great Britain, the United States, Canada, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway. RESULTS: In total, 45% of women reported experiencing vaginal symptoms. Only 4% of women attributed these symptoms to vaginal atrophy, and 63% failed to recognize vaginal atrophy as a chronic condition. Overall, 44% of respondents did not have a gynecologist, but this percentage varied between countries. Most women (75%) felt that vaginal atrophy had a negative impact on life, but this perception also showed country-specific differences. Most Finnish respondents (76%) were satisfied with the amount of information available about vaginal atrophy, compared with just 37-42% of women from other countries. Most women used over-the-counter products for vaginal atrophy symptoms, but specific means of treating the underlying cause were less well known. Almost half (46%) of all respondents lacked knowledge about local estrogen therapy, with women in Great Britain, the United States and Canada being most likely to lack knowledge of such treatment. Overall, 30% of women would consider taking local estrogen therapy, with vaginal tablets being the preferred option in all countries. CONCLUSION: Postmenopausal women have a low understanding of vaginal atrophy. Medical practitioners should proactively raise this topic, help patients to understand that vaginal atrophy is a chronic condition, and discuss treatment options. Country-specific approaches may be required.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CARDOZO, L. (1998) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00175-6 · Cited by 388
Cited by
2016 IMS Recommendations on women’s midlife health and menopause hormone therapy
Baber, R. J., Panay, N., & Fenton, A. (2016) · Climacteric · doi:10.3109/13697137.2015.1129166 · Cited by 964
Portman, D. J., & Gass, M. L. S. (2014) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000000329 · Cited by 688
The Etiology and Management of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Postmenopausal Women
Jung, C., & Brubaker, L. (2019) · Climacteric · doi:10.1080/13697137.2018.1551871 · Cited by 169
Metadata
- Authors
- Nappi, R. E., & Kokot-Kierepa, M.
- Venue
- Climacteric
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2011-12-14
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 36-44
- ISSN
- 1369-7137 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-0804
- OpenAlex
- W1973157699
- Cited by
- 407
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaginal Health: Insights, Views & Attitudes (VIVA) – results from an international survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/13697137.2011.647840
- The paper
- Nappi, R. E., & Kokot-Kierepa, M. (2012). Vaginal Health: Insights, Views & Attitudes (VIVA) – results from an international survey. Climacteric. https://doi.org/10.3109/13697137.2011.647840
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.