Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 452

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were useful markers in assessment of inflammatory response and disease activity in SLE patients

Qin, Baodong, Ma, Ning, Tang, Qingqin, Wei, Tingting, Yang, Min, Fu, Haitao, Hu, Zhide, Liang, Yan, Yang, Zaixing, Zhong, Renqian·2016·Modern Rheumatology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although there have been extensive investigations on neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and mean platelet volume (MPV) in many diseases, their roles in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) remain unclear. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate NLR, PLR, and MPV levels in adult SLE patients and explore their clinical significance. METHODS: A retrospective study involving 154 adult SLE patients and 151 healthy controls was performed. All clinical characteristics of the SLE patients were extracted from their medical records. NLR, PLR, and MPV levels between SLE patients and healthy controls were compared, and correlations between these indexes and clinical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Increased NLR, PLR, and MPV were observed in SLE patients. NLR was positively correlated with C-reaction protein (r = 0.509, p < 0.01), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (r = 0.610, p < 0.01), and SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores (r = 0.471, p < 0.01). PLR was positively correlated with SLEDAI scores (r = 0.44, p < 0.01). SLE patients with nephritis had higher NLR and PLR levels than those without nephritis (p < 0.01, p = 0.03). In addition, an NLR level of 2.065 was determined as predictive cut-off value of SLE (sensitivity 74.7%, specificity 77.5%, AUC = 0.828). Multiple regression analysis suggested that NLR was independently associated with SLE disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: NLR and PLR could reflect inflammatory response and disease activity in SLE patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14397595.2015.1091136

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 452

Metadata

Authors
Qin, B., Ma, N., Tang, Q., Wei, T., Yang, M., Fu, H., Hu, Z., Liang, Y., Yang, Z., & Zhong, R.
Venue
Modern Rheumatology
Published
2016-03-04
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
372-376
ISSN
  • 1439-7595 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-7609
OpenAlex
W2180588657
Cited by
452
References
1
FWCI
12.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were useful markers in assessment of inflammatory response and disease activity in SLE patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/14397595.2015.1091136
The paper
Qin, B., Ma, N., Tang, Q., Wei, T., Yang, M., Fu, H., Hu, Z., Liang, Y., Yang, Z., & Zhong, R. (2016). Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were useful markers in assessment of inflammatory response and disease activity in SLE patients. Modern Rheumatology. https://doi.org/10.3109/14397595.2015.1091136

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.