Cited by 19Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionBirth, Development, and Health

Cardiovascular function in women with recurrent miscarriage, pre-eclampsia and/or intrauterine growth restriction

Mahendru, Amita A., Everett, Thomas R., McEniery, Carmel M., Wilkinson, Ian B., Lees, Christoph C.·2013·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prepregnancy cardiovascular function and risk factors in women with previous pregnancy complications. METHODS: Thirty-four women with previous normal pregnancy (controls), 26 with unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM) and 14 with pre-eclampsia (PE) and/or intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), planning to conceive were recruited. Brachial and central blood pressures (BP), cardiac output (CO), peripheral vascular resistance (PVR), aortic stiffness, blood biochemistry and platelet aggregation were assessed. RESULTS: Women with previous PE/IUGR had higher brachial diastolic BP (78 ± 9 vs 71 ± 7 mmHg; p = 0.03), central systolic BP (107 ± 10 vs 99 ± 8 mmHg; p = 0.03), mean arterial pressure (92 ± 10 vs 84 ± 8 mmHg; p = 0.01) and PVR (1499 ± 300 vs 1250 ± 220 dynes.s(-1) cm(-5); p = 0.005), than the controls. No differences were observed in either cardiovascular function or blood biochemistry in women with unexplained RM compared with the controls. Women with previous PE/IUGR though not with RM had a stronger family history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than controls. CONCLUSIONS: Women with previous PE and/or IUGR had higher BP and PVR compared with controls, which may predispose them to CVD later in life. However, in the absence of underlying vascular pathology, women with unexplained RM did not have abnormal cardiovascular function. Prepregnancy period provides an opportunity to identify cardiovascular risks in relation to previous obstetric history.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14767058.2012.733774

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mahendru, A. A., Everett, T. R., McEniery, C. M., Wilkinson, I. B., & Lees, C. C.
Affiliations
  • Rosie Hospital (GB)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Lees, Christoph C.
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2012-11-02
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
351-356
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2132257284
Cited by
19
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
British Heart Foundation (FS/12/8/29377)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
cardiovascular function, recurrent pregnancy loss, preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure, aortic stiffness, platelet aggregation, family history of cardiovascular disease, pregnancy complications
MeSH terms
Abortion, Habitual, Adult, Blood Pressure, Cardiac Output, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cardiovascular System, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Humans, Platelet Aggregation, Pre-Eclampsia, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Vascular Resistance, Vascular Stiffness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review