Cited by 100Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementPregnancy and Medication ImpactDiabetes Management and Research

A randomized trial comparing perinatal outcomes using insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn in type 1 diabetes

Open access
Hod, Moshe, Mathiesen, Elisabeth R., Jovanovič, Lois, McCance, David R., Ivanisevic, Marina, Durán-Garcia, Santiago, Brøndsted, Lise, Nazeri, Avideh +1 more·2014·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir (IDet) with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), both with insulin aspart, in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. The perinatal and obstetric pregnancy outcomes are presented. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to IDet (n = 152) or NPH (n = 158) ≤12 months before pregnancy or at 8-12 gestational weeks. RESULTS: For IDet and NPH, there were 128 and 136 live births, 11 and 9 early fetal losses, and two and one perinatal deaths, respectively. Gestational age at delivery was greater for children from the IDet arm than the NPH arm (treatment difference: 0.49 weeks [95% CI 0.11;0.88], p = 0.012, linear regression). Sixteen children had a malformation (IDet: n = 8/142, 5.6%; NPH: n = 8/145, 5.5%). The incidence of adverse events was similar between treatments. CONCLUSION: IDet is as well tolerated as NPH as regards perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and no safety issues were identified.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14767058.2013.799650

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The safety of the use of aspart and detemir analogs was confirmed in randomized trials.

    “The safety of the use of aspart and detemir analogs was confirmed in randomized trials [104,105,106]”

    From Gestational Diabetes Mellitus—Recent Literature Review (2022) · cites this paper as [104]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]MacIntosh MCM Fleming KM Bailey JA et al Perinatal mortality and congenital anomalies in babies of women with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in England, Wales and Northern Ireland: population based study BMJ 2006 333 177 80 16782722 PMC1513435
  2. [3]Evers IM de Valk HW Visser GHA Risk of complications of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes: nationwide prospective study in the Netherlands BMJ 2004 328 915 19 15066886 PMC390158
  3. [4]Suhonen L Hiilesmaa V Teramo K Glycaemic control during early pregnancy and fetal malformations in women with type I diabetes mellitus Diabetologia 2000 43 79 82 10663219
  4. [5]Nielsen GL Sorensen HT Nielsen PH et al Glycosylated hemoglobin as predictor of adverse fetal outcome in type 1diabetic pregnancies Acta Diabetol 1997 34 217 22 9401644
  5. [6]Research Group DCCT Pregnancy outcomes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996 174 1343 53 8623868
  6. [7]Murphy HR Rayman G Duffield K et al Changes in the glycemic profiles of women with type 1 and type 2 diabetes during pregnancy Diabetes Care 2007 30 278 91 17666464
  7. [9]Casson IF Pregnancy in women with diabetes—after the CEMACH report, what now? Diabet Med 2006 23 481 4 16681556
  8. [10]Home PD Lindholm A Riis A European Insulin Aspart Study Group Insulin aspart vs. human insulin in the management of long-term blood glucose control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a randomized controlled trial Diabet Med 2000 17 762 70 11131100
  9. [11]Rosenstock J Schwartz SL Clark CM Jr et al Basal insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: 28-week comparison of insulin glargine (HOE 901) and NPH insulin Diabetes Care 2001 24 631 6 11315821
  10. [13]Bartley PC Bogoev M Larsen J Philotheou A Long-term efficacy and safety of insulin detemir compared to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin in patients with Type 1 diabetes using a treat-to-target basal-bolus regimen with insulin aspart at meals: a 2-year, randomized, controlled trial Diabet Med 2008 25 442 9 18387078 PMC2327220
  11. [15]Mathiesen ER Damm P Jovanovic L et al Basal insulin analogues in diabetic pregnancy: a literature review and baseline results of a randomised, controlled trial in type 1 diabetes Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011 27 543 51 21557440
  12. [16]Mathiesen ER Hod M Ivanisevic M et al Maternal efficacy and safety outcomes in a randomized controlled trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin in 310 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes mellitus Diabetes Care 2012 35 2012 17 22851598 PMC3447831
  13. [17]Heise T Nosek L Rønn BB et al Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes Diabetes 2004 53 1614 20 15161770
  14. [18]Klein O Lynge J Endahl L et al Albumin-bound basal insulin analogues (insulin detemir and NN344): comparable time-action profiles but less variability than insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes Diabetes Obes Metab 2007 9 290 9 17391154
  15. [19]Russell-Jones D Simpson R Hylleberg B et al Effects of QD insulin detemir or neutral protamine Hagedorn on blood glucose control in patients with type I diabetes mellitus using a basal-bolus regimen Clin Ther 2004 26 724 36 15220016
  16. [20]De Leeuw I Vague P Selam JL et al Insulin detemir used in basal-bolus therapy in people with type 1 diabetes is associated with a lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and less weight gain over 12 months in comparison to NPH insulin Diabetes Obes Metab 2005 7 73 82 15642078
  17. [21]Kølendorf K Ross GP Pavlic-Renar I et al Insulin detemir lowers the risk of hypoglycaemia and provides more consistent plasma glucose levels compared with NPH insulin in Type 1 diabetes Diabet Med 2006 23 729 35 16842476
  18. [22]Hermansen K Davies M Derezinski T et al A 26-week, randomized, parallel, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin as add-on therapy to oral glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes Diabetes Care 2006 29 1269 74 16732007
  19. [23]Philis-Tsimikas A Charpentier G Clauson P et al Comparison of once-daily insulin detemir with NPH insulin added to a regimen of oral antidiabetic drugs in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes Clin Ther 2006 28 1569 81 17157113
  20. [24]Fajardo Montañana C Hernández Herrero C Rivas Fernández M Less weight gain and hypoglycaemia with once-daily insulin detemir than NPH insulin in intensification of insulin therapy in overweight type 2 diabetes patients: the PREDICTIVE BMI clinical trial Diabet Med 2008 25 916 23 18959604
  21. [25]Hod M Damm P Kaaja R et al Insulin Aspart Pregnancy Study Group Fetal and perinatal outcomes in type 1 diabetes pregnancy: a randomized study comparing insulin aspart with human insulin in 322 subjects Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 198 186.e1 7 17905178
  22. [26]Penney GC Mair G Pearson DW Scottish Diabetes in Pregnancy Group Outcomes of pregnancies in women with type 1 diabetes in Scotland: a national population-based study BJOG 2003 110 315 18 12628275
  23. [27]Bell R Bailey K Cresswell T et al Northern Diabetic Pregnancy Survey Steering Group Trends in prevalence and outcomes of pregnancy in women with pre-existing type I and type II diabetes BJOG 2008 115 445 52 18271881
  24. [28]Lisi A Botto LD Robert-Gnansia E et al Surveillance of adverse fetal effects of medications (SAFE-Med): findings from the International Clearinghouse of Birth Defects Surveillance and Research Reprod Toxicol 2010 29 433 42 20347959

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hod, M., Mathiesen, E. R., Jovanovič, L., McCance, D. R., Ivanisevic, M., Durán-Garcia, S., Brøndsted, L., Nazeri, A., & Damm, P.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Sansum Diabetes Research Institute (US)
  • Royal Victoria Hospital (GB)
  • Hospital Universitario de Valme (ES)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Hod, Moshe
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2013-06-05
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
7-13
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2094987273
Cited by
100
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
12.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF14OC0009275)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
insulin detemir, type 1 diabetes in pregnancy, insulin aspart, perinatal outcomes, gestational age at delivery, fetal death, perinatal death, congenital malformations, insulin safety, obstetric outcomes
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Induced, Insulin Detemir, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Drug Combinations, Female, Fetal Death, Gestational Age, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Isophane, Pregnancy, Pregnancy in Diabetics, Pregnancy Outcome, Pregnancy, Ectopic, Insulin, Long-Acting, Live Birth, Insulin Aspart

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review