Cited by 504Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPregnancy and Medication Impact

15. Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022

Open access
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee·2022·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes” includes the ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SPPC), are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction (https://doi.org/10.2337/dc22-SINT). Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc22-s015

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 129 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [25]25. McElvy SS, Miodovnik M, Rosenn B, et al. A focused preconceptional and early pregnancy program in women with type 1 diabetes reduces perinatal mortality and malformation rates to general population levels. J Matern Fetal Med 2000;9:14 -20
  2. [9]9. 1 diabetes and HLA DR4-related gene interactions. Diabetologia 2007;50:850 -858
  3. [16]16. women with type 1 diabetes: an observational cohort study of 186 pregnancies. Diabetologia 2019;62:1143 -1153
  4. [30]30. newborn outcomes. Diabetes Care 2014;37: 3345 -3355
  5. [89]89. Barbour LA, Feig DS. Metformin and a personalized approach. Diabetes 2019;42:396 -399
  6. [17]17. controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2020;8:834 -844
  7. [7]7. in women with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37:364 -371

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee
Corresponding author
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2021-12-16
Volume
45
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S232-S243
ISSN
0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200179622
Cited by
504
References
129
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 125 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 12 · 2016: 1
FWCI
16.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
diabetes in pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus, clinical guidelines, treatment goals, quality of care
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Endocrinology, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Reference Standards, Societies, Medical, Standard of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review