Cited by 52Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsPregnancy-related medical researchBreastfeeding Practices and Influences

The influence of different maternal pushing positions on birth outcomes at the second stage of labor in nulliparous women

Moraloglu, Ozlem, Kansu-Celik, Hatice, Tasci, Yasemin, Karakaya, Burcu Kısa, Yilmaz, Yasar, Cakir, Ebru, Yakut, Halil Ibrahim·2017·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects on neonatal and maternal outcomes of different pushing positions during the second stage of labor in nulliparous women. METHODS: This prospective study included 102 healthy, pregnant, nulliparous women who were randomly allocated to either of two positions: a squatting using bars (n = 51), or a supine position modified to 45 degree of semi-fowler (n = 51) during the second stage of labor. Duration of the second stage of labor, maternal pain, postpartum blood loss, abnormal fetal heart rate patterns that required intervention, and newborn outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The trial showed that women who adopted the squatting position using bars experienced a significant reduction in the duration of the second stage of labor; they were less likely to be induced, and their Visual Analog Scale score was lower than those who were allocated the supine position modified to 45 degree of semi-fowler during second stage of labor (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences with regard to postpartum blood loss, neonatal birth weight, Apgar score at one and five minutes, or admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy nulliparous women, adopting a squatting position using bars was associated with a shorter second stage of labor, lower Visual Analog Scale score, more satisfaction, and a reduction in oxytocin requirements compared with adopting the supine position. For Turkish women, the squatting position is easy to adopt as it is more appropriate in terms of Turkish social habits and traditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14767058.2016.1169525

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moraloglu, O., Kansu-Celik, H., Tasci, Y., Karakaya, B. K., Yilmaz, Y., Cakir, E., & Yakut, H. I.
Affiliations
Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Kansu-Celik, Hatice
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2016-04-19
Volume
30
Issue
2
Pages
245-249
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2334553203
Cited by
52
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Breastfeeding Practices and Influences
Keywords
squatting position, supine position, second stage of labor, nulliparous women, labor duration, maternal pain, oxytocin requirement, postpartum blood loss, neonatal outcomes, fetal heart rate monitoring, Turkish women
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Labor Stage, Second, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Turkey, Supine Position, Delivery, Obstetric, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review