Cited by 15Innovations in Medical EducationHearing Loss and RehabilitationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring the effectiveness of an audiological counseling program.

English, Kris, Archbold, Sue·2014·International Journal of Audiology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Audiologists routinely observe patients struggle with psycho-emotional difficulties associated with hearing loss, yet are often underprepared to manage this vital aspect of patient care. For this reason, a workshop was developed for audiologists interested in expanding their counselling skills. Since one-time workshops typically do not result in changes in practice, this program adopted a distributed-over-time learning model, consisting of 20 hours of participation across six weeks. The extended nature of the program provided multiple opportunities to learn several counselling strategies, and apply and evaluate the effectiveness of these strategies in clinical settings. DESIGN: Learning objectives were assessed throughout the six-week program. However, at the conclusion of each program, it was unknown whether new knowledge carried over into sustained new skills. Therefore, we surveyed attendees six months after their program, to determine if the program had affected changes in their practice. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty clinicians (response rate = 91%) participated in the survey. RESULTS: All respondents made some, and often many, changes in patient communication. They applied several counseling concepts to their work settings and reported positive changes in patient-clinician dynamics. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that a six-week program is effective in helping clinicians change their counseling skills within their practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/14992027.2013.837224

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Bloom B.S, 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals
  2. Cappelli M., 1995, Volta Rev, 97, 197
  3. English K., 2012, Audiol Today, 24, 33
  4. Forsetlund L., 2009, Cochrane Database Systematic Review
  5. Luterman D, 2008, Counseling Persons with Communication Disorders
  6. Thom D., 2004, Health Aff, 23, 24
  7. Tresolini C.P, 2000, Health Professions Education and Relationship-centered Care

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 15

Metadata

Authors
English, K., & Archbold, S.
Affiliations
University of Akron (US)
Corresponding author
English, Kris
Venue
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2013-10-23
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
115-120
ISSN
  • 1499-2027 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8186
OpenAlex
W2044505492
Cited by
15
References
32
Citations by year
2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Audiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
hearing loss, audiologist training, distributed learning, continuing professional development, counseling skills, patient-clinician communication, program effectiveness
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Audiology, Communication, Counseling, Curriculum, Education, Continuing, Emotions, Female, Hearing Disorders, Humans, Learning, Male, Professional-Patient Relations, Surveys and Questionnaires, Correction of Hearing Impairment, Time Factors, Program Evaluation, Models, Educational, Persons with Hearing Disabilities, Persons With Hearing Impairments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review