Cited by 141Nanoparticles: synthesis and applicationsCarcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentAir Quality and Health Impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Nano-TiO2– feasibility and challenges for human health risk assessment based on open literature

Abstract

This study aims at investigating feasibility and challenges associated with conducting a human health risk assessment for nano-titanium-dioxide (nano-TiO₂) based on the open literature by following an approach similar to a classical regulatory risk assessment. Gaps in the available data set, both in relation to exposures and hazard, do not allow reaching any definite conclusions that could be used for regulatory decision-making. Results show that repeated inhalation in the workplace and possibly consumer inhalation may cause risks. Also short-term inhalation following spray applications may cause risks. Main future work should focus on generating occupational and consumer inhalation exposure data, as well as toxicity data on absorption following inhalation, repeated dermal contact, and contact with damaged skin. Also relevant seems further information on possible neurotoxicity and genotoxicity/carcinogenicity, as well as establishing a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for acute inhalation of nano-TiO₂.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17435390.2010.504899

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 93 · Cited by 141

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Afaq F, 1998, J Appl Toxicol, 18, 307, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1263(1998090)18:5<307::AID-JAT508>3.0.CO;2-K · DOI
  2. Ahn MH, 2005, Respiratory Research, 6, 34, 10.1186/1465-9921-6-34 · DOI
  3. Bermudez E, 2004, Toxicolog Sci, 77, 347, 10.1093/toxsci/kfh019 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1023/B:CACO.0000036188.23970.22 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chen HW, 2006, FASEB J, 20, 2393, 10.1096/fj.06-6485fje · DOI
  6. Chen J, 2009, J Appl Toxicol, 29, 330, 10.1002/jat.1414 · DOI
  7. Chen JL, 1988, J Occupat Med (Official Pub Industrial Med Assoc), 30, 937
  8. Churg A, 1999, Am J Physiol, 277, L975
  9. Duffin R, 2007, Inhalat Toxicol, 19, 849, 10.1080/08958370701479323 · DOI
  10. Dussert AS, 1997, Int J Cosmetic Sci, 19, 119, 10.1111/j.1467-2494.1997.tb00175.x · DOI
  11. Fabian E, 2008, Arch Toxicol, 82, 151, 10.1007/s00204-007-0253-y · DOI
  12. Ferin J, 1992, Am J Respirat Cell Molec Biol, 6, 535, 10.1165/ajrcmb/6.5.535 · DOI
  13. Fryzek JP, 2003, J Occup Environ Med/Am Coll Occup Environ Med, 45, 400, 10.1097/01.jom.0000058338.05741.45 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Gamer AO, 2006, Toxicol In Vitro, 20, 301, 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.08.008 · DOI
  15. 10.5271/sjweh.2087 · DOI
  16. Grassian VH, 2007, Nanotoxicology, 1, 211, 10.1080/17435390701694295 · DOI
  17. Gurr JR, 2005, Toxicology, 213, 66, 10.1016/j.tox.2005.05.007 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Heinrich U, 1995, Inhalat Toxicol, 7, 533, 10.3109/08958379509015211 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Helfenstein M, 2008, Toxicology, 253, 70, 10.1016/j.tox.2008.08.018 · DOI
  20. Hext PM, 2005, Ann Occup Hyg, 49, 461, 10.1093/annhyg/mei012 · DOI
  21. Hsu LY, 2007, J Nanopart Res, 9, 157, 10.1007/s11051-006-9185-3 · DOI
  22. Hussain SM, 2005, Toxicol In Vitro, 19, 975, 10.1016/j.tiv.2005.06.034 · DOI
  23. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), 2006, IARC Monogr, 93
  24. Inoue K, 2008, Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol, 21, 197, 10.1177/039463200802100122 · DOI
  25. Jin CY, 2008, Chem Res Toxicol, 21, 1871, 10.1021/tx800179f · DOI
  26. Johnston HJ, 2009, Particle Fibre Toxicol, 6, 33, 10.1186/1743-8977-6-33 · DOI
  27. Kang SJ, 2008, Environ Molec Mutagenesis, 49, 399, 10.1002/em.20399 · DOI
  28. Kim JK, 1999, J Toxicol Environ Health A, 58, 437, 10.1080/009841099157160 · DOI
  29. Kiss B, 2008, Experim Dermatol, 17, 659, 10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00683.x · DOI
  30. Komatsu T, 2008, Toxicol in Vitro, 22, 1825, 10.1016/j.tiv.2008.08.009 · DOI
  31. L’azou B, 2008, Particle Fibre Toxicol, 5, 22, 10.1186/1743-8977-5-22 · DOI
  32. Linnainmaa K, 1997, Toxicol In Vitro, 11, 329, 10.1016/S0887-2333(97)00000-3 · DOI
  33. Long TC, 2006, Environ Sci Technol, 40, 4346, 10.1021/es060589n · DOI
  34. Long TC, 2007, Environ Health Perspect, 115, 1631, 10.1289/ehp.10216 · DOI
  35. Mavon A, 2007, Skin Pharmacol Physiol, 20, 10, 10.1159/000096167 · DOI
  36. Park EJ, 2008, Toxicology Letters, 180, 222, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.06.869 · DOI
  37. Peters K, 2004, J Materials Sci Materials Med, 15, 321, 10.1023/B:JMSM.0000021095.36878.1b · DOI
  38. Pflucker F, 1999, Int J Cosmetic Sci, 21, 399
  39. Renwick LC, 2004, Occupat Environ Med, 61, 442, 10.1136/oem.2003.008227 · DOI
  40. Renwick LC, 2001, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 172, 119, 10.1006/taap.2001.9128 · DOI
  41. Sager TM, 2008, Particle Fibre Toxicol, 5, 17, 10.1186/1743-8977-5-17 · DOI
  42. Schulz J, 2002, Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 54, S157, 10.1016/S0169-409X(02)00120-5 · DOI
  43. Shimizu M, 2009, Particle Fibre Toxicol, 6
  44. Simon-Deckers A, 2008, Toxicology, 253, 137, 10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.007 · DOI
  45. Singh N, 2009, Biomaterials, 30, 3891, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.04.009 · DOI
  46. Trouiller B, 2009, Cancer Res, 69, 8784, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2496 · DOI
  47. Tsai S, 2009, J Nanoparticle Res, 11, 147, 10.1007/s11051-008-9459-z · DOI
  48. Wang J, 2008, Toxicol Lett, 183, 72, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.10.001 · DOI
  49. Wang J, 2008, Toxicology, 254, 82, 10.1016/j.tox.2008.09.014 · DOI
  50. Wang J, 2007, Toxicol Lett, 168, 176, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.12.001 · DOI
  51. Warheit DB, 2007, Toxicology, 230, 90, 10.1016/j.tox.2006.11.002 · DOI
  52. Warheit DB, 2007, Toxicol Lett, 171, 99, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.04.008 · DOI
  53. Wu J, 2009, Toxicol Lett, 191, 1, 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.05.020 · DOI
  54. Yokohira M, 2009, Pathol, 22, 71
  55. Zhang AP, 2004, World J Gastroenterol, 10, 3191, 10.3748/wjg.v10.i21.3191 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Christensen, F. M., Johnston, H. J., Stone, V., Aitken, R. J., Hankin, S., Peters, S., & Aschberger, K.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Edinburgh Napier University (GB)
  • Institute of Occupational Medicine (GB)
Corresponding author
Christensen, Frans M.
Venue
Nanotoxicology
Published
2010-08-23
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
110-124
ISSN
  • 1743-5390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-5404
OpenAlex
W2101660988
Cited by
141
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 19
FWCI
7.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nanotoxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Seventh Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Air Quality and Health Impacts
Keywords
nano-titanium dioxide, human health risk assessment, inhalation exposure, occupational exposure, consumer exposure, spray application, dermal exposure, neurotoxicity, genotoxicity, carcinogenicity, no-observed-adverse-effect level, regulatory risk assessment, data gaps
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Risk Factors, Titanium, Occupational Exposure, Risk Assessment, No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level, Inhalation Exposure, Nanoparticles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review