The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004–2007: baseline epidemiology
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: No prospective surveillance systems have been available for monitoring the outcome of cruciate ligament surgery in Scandinavia (Denmark, Norway, and Sweden). In the present paper we describe the Scandinavian ACL registries including their main function, similarities, and preliminary baseline results. METHODS: The Scandinavian registries were established in 2004 (Norway) and 2005 (Denmark and Sweden). The Danish and Swedish registries were originally based on the Norwegian registry, and there is no overriding difference between the three. In Denmark, all hospitals and clinics are legally bound to report to an approved national database. In Norway and Sweden, the registries are based on voluntarily reporting by surgeons. RESULTS: The annual incidence of primary ACL reconstructions is higher in Denmark than in Norway, except in females younger than 20 years. Among Scandinavian surgeons, there is a similar approach to the patients. Differences do, however, exist regarding choice of grafts, choice of implants, and choice of treatment of simultaneous meniscal and cartilage injuries; the proportion of ACL reconstructions performed as outpatient surgery; and the use of prophylactic anticoagulation. Clinically, the preoperative KOOS scores are not significantly different between the Scandinavian registries, except that Denmark reports more symptoms both pre- and postoperatively. INTERPRETATION: The Scandinavian national ACL registries will generate new data about ACL reconstructions. They will contribute important knowledge regarding ACL epidemiology. They will be the only source of data on the performance of a wide range of different implants and techniques. In addition, they will hopefully have an impact on the selection of methods for ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia and elsewhere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Incidence of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears and Reconstruction: A 21-Year Population-Based Study
Sanders, T. L., Maradit Kremers, H., Bryan, A. J., Larson, D. R., Dahm, D. L., Levy, B. A., Stuart, M. J., & Krych, A. J. (2016) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546516629944 · Cited by 1,325
Grindem, H., Snyder-Mackler, L., Moksnes, H., Engebretsen, L., & Risberg, M. A. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096031 · Cited by 1,313
Self-citationArdern, C. L., Glasgow, P., Schneiders, A., Witvrouw, E., Clarsen, B., Cools, A., Gojanovic, B., Griffin, S., Khan, K. M., Moksnes, H., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1136/bjsports-2016-096278 · Cited by 985
20 Years of Pediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in New York State
Dodwell, E. R., LaMont, L. E., Green, D. W., Pan, T. J., Marx, R. G., & Lyman, S. (2014) · The American Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/0363546513518412 · Cited by 414
Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in the United States
Buller, L. T., Best, M. J., Baraga, M. G., & Kaplan, L. D. (2015) · Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1177/2325967114563664 · Cited by 335
Metadata
- Authors
- Granan, L.-P., Forssblad, M., Lind, M., & Engebretsen, L.
- Venue
- Acta Orthopaedica
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 563-567
- ISSN
- 1745-3674 (ISSN-L)
- 1745-3682
- OpenAlex
- W2135643927
- Cited by
- 348
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004–2007: baseline epidemiology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17453670903350107
- The paper
- Granan, L.-P., Forssblad, M., Lind, M., & Engebretsen, L. (2009). The Scandinavian ACL registries 2004–2007: baseline epidemiology. Acta Orthopaedica. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453670903350107
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.