Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures

Open access
Kristiansen, Bjarne, Barfod, Gunner, Bredesen, Jesper, Erin-madsen, Jes, Grum, Bjarne, Horsnaes, Mogen W., Aalberg, Jens Ranch·1987·Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica

Abstract

In an urban population of half a million, all proximal humeral fractures were recorded in 1983. A total of 565 fractures, of which 77 per cent occurred in women, were seen. The overall incidence per 100,000 was 48 in men and 142 in women, with an exponential increase from the 5th decade of age. This rise was due to a higher incidence of minimally displaced fractures associated with moderate trauma, and thus of fractures associated with osteoporosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/17453678709146347

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Kristiansen, B., Barfod, G., Bredesen, J., Erin-madsen, J., Grum, B., Horsnaes, M. W., & Aalberg, J. R.
Venue
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica
Published
1987-01
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
75-77
ISSN
0001-6470 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969912263
Cited by
196
References
0
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/17453678709146347
The paper
Kristiansen, B., Barfod, G., Bredesen, J., Erin-madsen, J., Grum, B., Horsnaes, M. W., & Aalberg, J. R. (1987). Epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678709146347

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.